• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效

Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Wu Qing-Bin, Deng Xiang-Bing, Zhang Xu-Bing, Kong Ling-Hong, Zhou Zong-Guang, Wang Zi-Qiang

机构信息

1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China .

2 West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):637-644. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0630. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2017.0630
PMID:29323615
Abstract

AIM

To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery at our department from January 2009 to December 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary end points were 3-year local recurrence and overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic group had longer operative time (165.0 versus 140.0, P < .001), less blood loss (20.0 versus 40.0, P < .001), shorter length of incision (5.0 versus 18.0, P < .001), and more lymph node harvested (11.0 versus 9.0, P = .002). However, time to first flatus (P = .941), postoperative hospital stay (P = .095), postoperative complications (P = .155), and 30-day mortality (P = .683) was similar between two groups. With the median follow-up period of 65 months, the 3-year local recurrence rate was 4.3% in laparoscopic group and 7.5% in open group (P = .077); the 3-year overall and DFS rates were similar in two groups (85.9% versus 88.8%, P = .229 and 76.9% versus 79.2%, P = .448, respectively); and the overall and DFS curves were comparable between two groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.858, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.709-1.037, P = .112 and HR = 1.076, 95% CI 0.834-1.389, P = .275, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery is safe and has equivalent long-term oncologic outcomes for low rectal cancer when compared to open surgery. Furthermore, large-scale, prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the present findings.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2009年1月至2013年12月在我科接受腹腔镜或开放手术的低位直肠癌患者。主要终点为3年局部复发率、总生存率和无病生存率(DFS)。次要终点为术中及术后结果。

结果

腹腔镜组手术时间较长(165.0对140.0,P<0.001),失血量较少(20.0对40.0,P<0.001),切口长度较短(5.0对18.0,P<0.001),清扫淋巴结较多(11.0对9.0,P = 0.002)。然而,两组首次排气时间(P = 0.941)、术后住院时间(P = 0.095)、术后并发症(P = 0.155)及30天死亡率(P = 0.683)相似。中位随访期为65个月,腹腔镜组3年局部复发率为4.3%,开放组为7.5%(P = 0.077);两组3年总生存率和DFS率相似(分别为85.9%对88.8%,P = 0.229;76.9%对79.2%,P = 0.448);两组总生存曲线和DFS曲线具有可比性(风险比[HR]=0.858,95%置信区间[CI]0.709 - 1.037,P = 0.112;HR = 1.076,95%CI 0.834 - 1.389,P = 0.275)。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗低位直肠癌安全且长期肿瘤学疗效相当。此外,需要大规模、前瞻性随机临床试验来证实本研究结果。

相似文献

1
Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):637-644. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0630. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage I rectal cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗Ⅰ期直肠癌:长期肿瘤学结果。
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):646-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1846-z.
3
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.
4
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
5
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与传统开放手术治疗低位直肠癌的括约肌间切除术:系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Feb;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0495. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹经括约肌间切除术联合结肠肛管吻合术治疗低位直肠癌:中期肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):941-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318236c448.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜辅助腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌可缩短住院时间,且不影响复发率或生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1244-x. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
9
Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.腹腔镜及中转开腹直肠癌切除术具有更好的长期疗效:一项手术方式的对比研究
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1940-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3419-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效:单中心回顾性分析
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;65(5):273-82. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.5.273.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
2
Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Surgery for Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: The LASRE Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助手术与开放手术治疗低位直肠癌患者的短期结局:LASRE随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 15;8(11):1607-15. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4079.
3
Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.
腹腔镜与开放直肠癌低位前切除术短期和长期结局研究设计的异同:一项对随机、病例匹配和队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Nov 21;5(2):183-193. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12409. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
One-stitch method vs. traditional method of protective loop ileostomy for rectal cancer: the impact of BMI obesity.单吻合器技术与传统保护性回肠造口术在直肠癌治疗中的对比:BMI 肥胖的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;147(9):2709-2719. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03556-z. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
The effect of increased body mass index values on surgical outcomes after radical resection for low rectal cancer.体重指数升高对低位直肠癌根治性切除术后手术结局的影响。
Surg Today. 2019 May;49(5):401-409. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01778-w. Epub 2019 Feb 18.