School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Zollikofen, Switzerland.
Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2021-2034. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14046. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
Climate change projections anticipate increased frequency and intensity of drought stress, but grassland responses to severe droughts and their potential to recover are poorly understood. In many grasslands, high land-use intensity has enhanced productivity and promoted resource-acquisitive species at the expense of resource-conservative ones. Such changes in plant functional composition could affect the resistance to drought and the recovery after drought of grassland ecosystems with consequences for feed productivity resilience and environmental stewardship. In a 12-site precipitation exclusion experiment in upland grassland ecosystems across Switzerland, we imposed severe edaphic drought in plots under rainout shelters and compared them with plots under ambient conditions. We used soil water potentials to scale drought stress across sites. Impacts of precipitation exclusion and drought legacy effects were examined along a gradient of land-use intensity to determine how grasslands resisted to, and recovered after drought. In the year of precipitation exclusion, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) in plots under rainout shelters was -15% to -56% lower than in control plots. Drought effects on ANPP increased with drought severity, specified as duration of topsoil water potential ψ < -100 kPa, irrespective of land-use intensity. In the year after drought, ANPP had completely recovered, but total species diversity had declined by -10%. Perennial species showed elevated mortality, but species richness of annuals showed a small increase due to enhanced recruitment. In general, the more resource-acquisitive grasses increased at the expense of the deeper-rooted forbs after drought, suggesting that community reorganization was driven by competition rather than plant mortality. The negative effects of precipitation exclusion on forbs increased with land-use intensity. Our study suggests a synergistic impact of land-use intensification and climate change on grassland vegetation composition, and implies that biomass recovery after drought may occur at the expense of biodiversity maintenance.
气候变化预测表明,干旱压力的频率和强度将会增加,但草原对严重干旱的响应及其恢复能力仍知之甚少。在许多草原地区,高强度的土地利用提高了生产力,并促进了资源获取型物种的生长,而牺牲了资源保守型物种。这种植物功能组成的变化可能会影响草原生态系统对干旱的抵抗力和干旱后的恢复能力,从而对饲料生产力的恢复力和环境管理产生影响。在瑞士高地草原生态系统的 12 个地点的降水排除实验中,我们在遮雨棚下的样地中施加严重的土壤干旱,并将其与对照样地进行比较。我们利用土壤水势来衡量不同地点的干旱胁迫程度。我们沿着土地利用强度梯度来研究降水排除和干旱遗留效应的影响,以确定草原如何抵抗干旱以及在干旱后如何恢复。在降水排除的那一年,遮雨棚下样地的地上净初级生产力(ANPP)比对照样地低 15%至 56%。无论土地利用强度如何,干旱对 ANPP 的影响都随着干旱严重程度的增加而增加,干旱严重程度以表土水势 ψ<−100 kPa 的持续时间来表示。在干旱后的那一年,ANPP 已经完全恢复,但总物种多样性下降了 10%。多年生物种的死亡率升高,但由于繁殖增加,一年生物种的丰富度略有增加。总的来说,在干旱后,资源获取型草类增加,而扎根更深的草本植物减少,这表明群落重组是由竞争而不是植物死亡驱动的。降水排除对草本植物的负面影响随着土地利用强度的增加而增加。我们的研究表明,土地利用强度的增加和气候变化对草原植被组成有协同影响,并暗示生物量在干旱后的恢复可能以牺牲生物多样性的维持为代价。