• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的预后比较:一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究

[Comparison of prognosis between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: a single center, retrospective case-control study].

作者信息

Hua B, Lu X, Xiao W Z, Yang X, He S R, Wang Z

机构信息

Breast Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 1;56(1):56-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.013.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.013
PMID:29325355
Abstract

To elucidate the clinicopathological characters and prognostic factors of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast (IMPC) by compared with invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified of the breast (IDC). The retrospective study was performed with female patients who had undergone curative resection for breast cancer without neoadjuvant chemotherapy from June 2008 to April 2016 in Breast Center of Beijing Hospital. Forty-seven mixed or pure IMPC patients and 93 pure IDC patients(admitted in the same center from October 2008 to January 2016 ) were matched for tumor stage, nodal status and age. Follow-up was done every 3 to 6 months postoperatively. The deadline was July 31, 2016. The curves of disease free survival and overall survival were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival rates were compared by means of the Log-rank test. Potential prognostic variables that were identified on univariate analysis were analyzed with Cox's proportional hazards regression model for multivariate analysis. The χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare distributions across 2 groups and the Mann-Whitney test or test was used to analyze the medians or means of 2 groups. With exact matches, the rates of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (29.8% . 12.9%, χ(2)=5.885, =0.015)and histological grade 3 (40.4% . 21.5%, χ(2)=-2.690, =0.007) were both significantly higher in patients with IMPC than that in IDC group, but the survival between the two pathological types were not significantly different (all >0.05). The percent of IMPC component didn't influence the clinicopathologic characters (all >0.05), but a significantly longer median disease free survival (χ(2)=11.731, =0.001) when the patients had more than 50% of IMPC component was found. Higher rates of LVI and histological grade 3 were found in IMPC than that in IDC, but the survival was comparable between the two groups. A longer DFS occurred in patients with IMPC component more than 50%.

摘要

通过与乳腺非特殊类型浸润性导管癌(IDC)对比,阐明乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌(IMPC)的临床病理特征及预后因素。对2008年6月至2016年4月在北京医院乳腺中心接受乳腺癌根治性切除且未行新辅助化疗的女性患者进行回顾性研究。将47例混合性或纯IMPC患者与93例纯IDC患者(于2008年10月至2016年1月在同一中心收治)按照肿瘤分期、淋巴结状态和年龄进行匹配。术后每3至6个月进行随访。截止日期为2016年7月31日。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制无病生存曲线和总生存曲线,并通过Log-rank检验比较生存率。对单因素分析中确定的潜在预后变量,采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行多因素分析。采用χ(2)检验或Fisher确切概率法比较两组间的分布情况,采用Mann-Whitney检验或检验分析两组的中位数或均值。经精确匹配,IMPC患者的淋巴管浸润(LVI)率(29.8% 对12.9%,χ(2)=5.885,P =0.015)和组织学3级率(40.4% 对21.5%,χ(2)= -2.690,P =0.007)均显著高于IDC组,但两种病理类型之间的生存情况无显著差异(均P>0.05)。IMPC成分百分比不影响临床病理特征(均P>0.05),但当患者IMPC成分超过50%时,无病生存期的中位数显著延长(χ(2)=11.731,P =0.001)。IMPC的LVI率和组织学3级率高于IDC,但两组间生存情况相当。IMPC成分超过50%的患者无病生存期更长。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of prognosis between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: a single center, retrospective case-control study].乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌的预后比较:一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 1;56(1):56-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.013.
2
[The comparison of characters between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified of the breast].[乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌与非特殊类型浸润性导管癌的特征比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 1;55(10):770-774. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.10.011.
3
Differences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06).乳腺浸润性微乳头癌、含微乳头成分的癌与浸润性导管癌之间预后因素及失败模式的差异:回顾性多中心病例对照研究(KROG 13-06)
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Oct;15(5):353-61.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
4
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.尽管乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌临床表现具有侵袭性,但与乳腺浸润性导管癌相比,其长期生存率更高:基于大型人群数据库和病例对照分析的比较
Cancer Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2775-2786. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1227. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌:一种不常见且高度侵袭性乳腺癌变体的临床病理研究。
Breast J. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12128. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Long-term outcome of invasive pure micropapillary breast cancer compared with invasive mixed micropapillary and invasive ductal breast cancer: a matched retrospective study.浸润性单纯微乳头状乳腺癌与浸润性混合微乳头状和浸润性导管乳腺癌的长期预后比较:一项匹配的回顾性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):333-347. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07422-7. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
Differences in prognostic factors and patterns of failure between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: matched case-control study.浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌乳腺癌患者预后因素及失败模式的差异:匹配病例对照研究。
Breast. 2010 Jun;19(3):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
8
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had poor clinical characteristics but showed no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌具有较差的临床特征,但与浸润性导管癌相比,其预后并无差异。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug 5;14(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0960-z.
9
Comparison of invasive micropapillary and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性微乳头癌与三阴性浸润性导管癌的比较。
Breast. 2015 Dec;24(6):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
10
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis among patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with invasive micropapillary carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with ductal carcinoma in situ: A retrospective cohort study.单纯性浸润性导管癌、浸润性导管癌合并浸润性微乳头状癌以及浸润性导管癌合并导管原位癌患者的临床病理特征及预后比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23487. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023487.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in breast: A meta-analysis of PSM studies.浸润性微乳头状癌与乳腺浸润性导管癌预后的比较:PSM 研究的荟萃分析。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.041. Epub 2020 Jan 29.