Jiang L, Song Y, Xu J J, Tang X F, Wang H H, Jiang P, Gao L J, Song L, Gao Z, Chen J, Gao R L, Qiao S B, Yang Y J, Xu B, Yuan J Q
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1058-1066. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.010.
To investigate the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) . From January to December 2013, 10 445 consecutive patients who underwent PCI in Fuwai Hospital and the LVEF value was available were prospectively included. The patients were divided into LVEF≥50% group (9 896 cases) and LVEF50% group (549 cases) . The in-hospital and 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The association between LVEF50% and clinical outcomes was assessed using multivariable Cox regression analysis. (1) Compared with LVEF ≥50% group, LVEF 50% group had higher rates of in-hospital all-cause death (1.1% (6/549) vs. 0.2% (17/9 896) , 0.01) , cardiac death (1.1% (6/549) vs. 0.1% (12/9 896) , 0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (0.7% (4/549) vs. 0.2% (18/9 896) , 0.01) , myocardial infarction (2.4% (13/549) vs. 1.2% (121/9 896) , 0.05) ,and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) which including death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, in-stent thrombosis, and stroke (3.6% (20/549) vs. 1.4% (137/9 896) , 0.01) . (2) A total of 10 388 (99.5%) patients completed 2-year follow-up. Compared with LVEF ≥50% group, LVEF50% group had higher rates of 2-year all-cause death (4.7% (26/549) vs. 1.0% (101/9 896) , 0.01) , cardiac death (4.0% (22/549) vs. 0.5% (50/9 896) , 0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (3.1% (17/549) vs. 0.7% (71/9 896) , 0.001) , myocardial infarction (4.2% (23/549) vs. 1.9% (186/9 896) , 0.01) ,and MACCE (17.9% (98/549) vs. 11.8% (1 172/9 896) , 0.01) . There were no significant differences on the rates of 2-year target-vessel revascularization, bleeding and stroke between the two groups. (3) The multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that LVEF 50% was the independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death (=2.47, 95% 1.49-4.08, 0.01) , cardiac death (=3.25, 95% 1.79-5.90, 0.01) , in-stent thrombosis (=4.19, 95% 2.39-7.34, 0.01) , myocardial infarction (=2.00, 95% 1.26-3.16, 0.01) , and MACCE (=1.40, 95% 1.13-1.74, <0.01) . (4) After propensity score matching, all in-hospital outcomes were similar between the two groups, including all-cause death, cardiac death, in-stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, revascularization, bleeding, stroke, and MACCE (all 0.05) . After propensity score matching,the multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that LVEF50% was still an independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death (=3.08, 95% 1.37-6.89, 0.01) , cardiac death (= 4.12, 95% 1.53-11.07, 0.01) ,and in-stent thrombosis (=3.82, 95% 1.27-11.5, 0.05) . LVEF 50% is an independent risk factor of 2-year all-cause death, cardiac death, and in-stent thrombosis in patients undergoing PCI, but it does not increase the risk of target-vessel revascularization, bleeding or stroke.
探讨左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%的患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的院内及长期预后。方法:前瞻性纳入2013年1月至12月在阜外医院连续接受PCI且LVEF值可获取的10445例患者。将患者分为LVEF≥50%组(9896例)和LVEF<50%组(549例)。比较两组的院内及2年临床预后。采用多变量Cox回归分析评估LVEF<50%与临床预后的关联。结果:(1)与LVEF≥50%组相比,LVEF<50%组的院内全因死亡(1.1%(6/549)对0.2%(17/9896),P<0.01)、心源性死亡(1.1%(6/549)对0.1%(12/9896),P<0.01)、支架内血栓形成(0.7%(4/549)对0.2%(18/9896),P<0.01)、心肌梗死(2.4%(13/549)对1.2%(121/9896),P=0.05)及主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE,包括死亡、心肌梗死、血运重建、支架内血栓形成和卒中)发生率更高(3.6%(20/549)对1.4%(137/9896),P<0.01)。(2)共10388例(99.5%)患者完成2年随访。与LVEF≥50%组相比,LVEF<50%组的2年全因死亡(4.7%(26/549)对1.0%(101/9896),P<0.01)、心源性死亡(4.0%(22/549)对0.5%(50/9896),P<0.01)、支架内血栓形成(3.1%(17/549)对0.7%(71/9896),P<0.001)、心肌梗死(4.2%(23/549)对1.