Nielsen Tove Lise, Andersen Niels Trolle, Petersen Kirsten Schultz, Polatajko Helene, Nielsen Claus Vinther
a Section for Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
b Department of Occupational Therapy , VIA University College , Aarhus , Denmark.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Jul;26(5):325-342. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1424236. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
There is growing interest in enabling older adults' occupational performance. We tested whether 11 weeks of intensive client-centred occupational therapy (ICC-OT) was superior to usual practice in improving the occupational performance of home-dwelling older adults.
An assessor-masked randomized controlled trial among adults 60 + with chronic health issues, who received or applied for homecare services. Recruitment took place September 2012 to April 2014. All participants received practical and personal assistance and meal delivery as needed. In addition, they were randomized to receive either a maximum 22 sessions of occupation-based ICC-OT (N = 59) or to receive usual practice with a maximum three sessions of occupational therapy (N = 60). The primary outcome was self-rated occupational performance assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
No important adverse events occurred. ICC-OT was accepted by 46 participants (88%), usual practice by 60 (100%). After 3 months, the ICC-OT-group had improved 1.86 points on COPM performance; the Usual-Practice group had improved 0.61 points. The between-group difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval 0.50 to 2.02), t-test: p = 0.001.
ICC-OT improved older adults' occupational performance more effectively than usual practice. This result may benefit older adults and support programmatic changes.
提高老年人的职业表现正受到越来越多的关注。我们测试了为期11周的以客户为中心的强化职业治疗(ICC-OT)在改善居家老年人职业表现方面是否优于常规治疗。
在60岁及以上患有慢性健康问题、接受或申请居家护理服务的成年人中进行了一项评估者盲法随机对照试验。招募时间为2012年9月至2014年4月。所有参与者根据需要接受实际和个人援助以及送餐服务。此外,他们被随机分为接受最多22节基于职业的ICC-OT(N = 59)或接受最多3节职业治疗的常规治疗(N = 60)。主要结局是使用加拿大职业表现测量量表(COPM)评估的自评职业表现。
未发生重大不良事件。46名参与者(88%)接受了ICC-OT,60名(100%)接受了常规治疗。3个月后,ICC-OT组的COPM表现提高了1.86分;常规治疗组提高了0.61分。组间差异具有统计学意义(95%置信区间0.50至2.02),t检验:p = 0.001。
ICC-OT在改善老年人职业表现方面比常规治疗更有效。这一结果可能使老年人受益,并支持方案的改变。