Division of Bioequivalence II, Office of Bioequivalence, Office of Generic Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Division of Therapeutic Performance, Office of Research and Standard, Office of Generic Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
AAPS J. 2018 Jan 11;20(2):26. doi: 10.1208/s12248-017-0182-5.
There are several drug products that bind phosphate or bile acid in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to exert their therapeutic efficacy. In vitro binding studies are used to assess bioequivalence (BE) of these products. The objective of this study is to identify the common deficiencies in Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for these products. Deficiencies were compiled from ANDAs containing in vitro binding BE studies. The deficiencies were classified into eight categories: Pre-Study Method Validation, During-Study Sample Analysis, Study Design, Study Procedure, Dissolution/Disintegration, Analytical Site Inspection, Data Submission, and Formulations. Within each category, additional subcategories were defined to characterize the deficiencies. A total of 712 deficiencies from 95 ANDAs for 11 drug products were identified and included in the analysis. The four categories with the most deficiencies were During-Study Sample Analysis (27.8%), Pre-Study Method Validation (17.3%), Data Submission (16.7%), and Study Design (15.7%). For the During-Study Sample Analysis category, failure to submit complete raw data or analytical runs ranked as the top deficiency (32.8%). For the Study Design category, using an unacceptable alternate study design (26.8%) was the most common deficiency. Within this category, other commonly occurring deficiencies included incorrect/insufficient number of absorbent concentrations, failure to pre-treat drug product with acid, insufficient number of replicates in study, incorrect calculation of k1 and k2 values, incorrect dosage form or pooled samples used in the study, and incorrect pH of study medium. The review and approval of these products may be accelerated if these common deficiencies are addressed in the original ANDA submissions.
有几种药物产品可以在胃肠道(GI)中结合磷酸盐或胆汁酸来发挥其治疗效果。体外结合研究用于评估这些产品的生物等效性(BE)。本研究的目的是确定这些产品的简化新药申请(ANDA)中常见的缺陷。缺陷是从含有体外结合 BE 研究的 ANDA 中汇编的。缺陷分为八类:研究前方法验证、研究期间样品分析、研究设计、研究程序、溶出/崩解、分析现场检查、数据提交和配方。在每个类别中,都定义了其他子类别来描述缺陷。从 95 份用于 11 种药物产品的 ANDA 中确定并包括在分析中的共有 712 个缺陷。缺陷最多的四个类别是研究期间的样品分析(27.8%)、研究前方法验证(17.3%)、数据提交(16.7%)和研究设计(15.7%)。在研究期间的样品分析类别中,未能提交完整的原始数据或分析运行被列为最常见的缺陷(32.8%)。在研究设计类别中,使用不可接受的替代研究设计(26.8%)是最常见的缺陷。在该类别中,其他常见的缺陷包括不正确/数量不足的吸收浓度、未对药物产品进行酸预处理、研究中重复次数不足、不正确计算 k1 和 k2 值、研究中使用不正确的剂型或混合样品,以及研究介质的 pH 值不正确。如果在原始 ANDA 提交中解决了这些常见缺陷,这些产品的审查和批准可能会加快。