University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Quinnipiac University Frank Netter School of Medicine, North Haven, CT, USA.
Stress Health. 2018 Aug;34(3):462-467. doi: 10.1002/smi.2795. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
This study examined whether depressive symptoms and/or diabetes distress mediate the association between relationship style and glycaemic control in women with diabetes. Seventy-five women with type 2 diabetes completed the Relationship Questionnaire. Participants endorsing "secure" or "preoccupied" adult attachment were combined into the interactive relationship style and "dismissing/avoidant" or "fearful" adult attachment were combined into the independent relationship style. Glycaemic control was a latent variable composed of A1c and 48-hr continuously measured glucose. Diabetes distress was assessed with the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale and depressive symptoms with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. A parallel multiple mediation model with relationship style as the independent variable, glycaemic control as the dependent variable, and Problem Areas in Diabetes and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale as mediators, tested indirect effects. Bias-corrected bootstrap with 10,000 replications was used to construct 95% confidence intervals. The indirect association of relationship style with glycaemic control through diabetes distress was significant (effect = -0.09, p = .036, 95CI = -0.19-0.01), but through depressive symptoms was not. A model testing the indirect association of relationship style with diabetes distress through glycaemic control was not significant. Results suggest that relationship style is associated with glycaemic control through diabetes distress in women with type 2 diabetes.
本研究旨在探讨抑郁症状和/或糖尿病困扰是否在女性糖尿病患者的关系风格与血糖控制之间起中介作用。75 名 2 型糖尿病女性完成了关系问卷。将“安全”或“痴迷”的成人依恋者合并为互动关系风格,将“轻视/回避”或“恐惧”的成人依恋者合并为独立关系风格。血糖控制是由 A1c 和 48 小时连续测量的血糖组成的潜在变量。糖尿病困扰用糖尿病问题领域量表评估,抑郁症状用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估。采用平行多重中介模型,以关系风格为自变量,血糖控制为因变量,糖尿病问题领域量表和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表为中介变量,检验间接效应。采用 10,000 次重复的偏置校正自举法构建 95%置信区间。关系风格通过糖尿病困扰与血糖控制的间接关联具有统计学意义(效应值=-0.09,p=.036,95CI=-0.19-0.01),但通过抑郁症状则无统计学意义。一个测试关系风格通过血糖控制与糖尿病困扰的间接关联的模型没有统计学意义。结果表明,在 2 型糖尿病女性中,关系风格与血糖控制通过糖尿病困扰相关。