• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢肌肉骨骼疾病在门诊康复环境中移动性测量变化的敏感性。

Sensitivity to change of mobility measures in musculoskeletal conditions on lower extremities in outpatient rehabilitation settings.

机构信息

a Department of Education , Region of Murcia , Murcia , Spain.

b Department of Physical Therapy , EUSES University School, University of Girona , Girona , Spain.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(11):1268-1274. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1424948. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2018.1424948
PMID:29327598
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the sensitivity of the Mobility Activities Measure for lower extremities and to compare it to the sensitivity of the Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10) and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) at week 4 and week 8 post-hospitalization in outpatient rehabilitation settings.

BACKGROUND

Mobility Activities Measure is a set of short mobility measures to track outpatient rehabilitation progress: its scales have shown good properties but its sensitivity to change has not been reported.

METHODS

Patients with musculoskeletal conditions were recruited at admission in three outpatient rehabilitation settings in Spain. Data were collected at admission, week 4 and week 8 from an initial sample of 236 patients (mean age ± SD = 36.7 ± 11.1).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mobility Activities Measure scales for lower extremity; PF-10; and PSFS.

RESULTS

All the Mobility Activities Measure scales were sensitive to both positive and negative changes (the Standardized Response Means (SRMs) ranged between 1.05 and 1.53 at week 4, and between 0.63 and 1.47 at week 8). The summary measure encompassing the three Mobility Activities Measure scales detected a higher proportion of participants who had improved beyond the minimal detectable change (MDC) than detected by the PSFS and the PF-10 both at week 4 (86.64% vs. 69.81% and 42.23%, respectively) and week 8 (71.14% vs. 55.65% and 60.81%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The three Mobility Activities Measure scales assessing the lower extremity can be used across outpatient rehabilitation settings to provide consistent and sensitive measures of changes in patients' mobility. Implications for rehabilitation All the scales of the Mobility Activities Measure for the lower extremity were sensitive to both positive and negative change across the follow-up periods. Overall, the summary measure encompassing the three Mobility Activities Measure scales for the lower extremity appeared more sensitive to positive changes than the Physical Functioning Scale, especially during the first four weeks of treatment. The summary measure also detected a higher percentage of participants with positive change that exceeded the minimal detectable change than the Patient-Specific Functional Scale and the Physical Functioning Scale at the first follow-up period. By demonstrating their consistency and sensitivity to change, the three Mobility Activities Measures scales can now be considered in order to track patients' functional progress. Mobility Activities Measure can be therefore used in patients with musculoskeletal conditions across outpatient rehabilitation settings to provide estimates of change in mobility activities focusing on the lower extremity.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性纵向研究。

目的

在门诊康复环境中,检测下肢活动能力测量表(Mobility Activities Measure)的灵敏度,并将其与物理功能量表(PF-10)和患者特定功能量表(PSFS)在住院后第 4 周和第 8 周的灵敏度进行比较。

背景

下肢活动能力测量表是一组用于跟踪门诊康复进展的短期活动能力测量表:其量表已显示出良好的特性,但尚未报告其对变化的灵敏度。

方法

在西班牙的三个门诊康复环境中,招募患有肌肉骨骼疾病的患者。在初始样本 236 名患者中,在入院时(平均年龄±标准差=36.7±11.1 岁)、第 4 周和第 8 周收集数据。

主要观察指标

下肢活动能力测量表量表;PF-10;PSFS。

结果

所有下肢活动能力测量表量表对阳性和阴性变化均敏感(第 4 周的标准化反应均值(SRM)范围为 1.05-1.53,第 8 周的范围为 0.63-1.47)。包含三个下肢活动能力测量表量表的综合指标,在第 4 周和第 8 周时,比 PSFS 和 PF-10 检测到更高比例的改善超过最小可检测变化(MDC)的参与者(分别为 86.64%、69.81%和 42.23%;分别为 71.14%、55.65%和 60.81%)。

结论

评估下肢的三个下肢活动能力测量表量表可用于门诊康复环境,以提供患者移动性变化的一致和敏感的测量。

对康复的影响

下肢活动能力测量表的所有三个量表在整个随访期间均对阳性和阴性变化敏感。总体而言,在第一个治疗四周内,包含三个下肢活动能力测量表的综合指标对阳性变化的敏感性似乎高于物理功能量表。该综合指标在第一个随访期也检测到更高比例的阳性变化参与者,其改善超过最小可检测变化,比患者特定功能量表和物理功能量表都要高。通过证明其对变化的一致性和敏感性,现在可以考虑使用这三个下肢活动能力测量表来跟踪患者的功能进展。因此,在门诊康复环境中,患有肌肉骨骼疾病的患者可以使用下肢活动能力测量表来提供对下肢活动能力变化的估计。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity to change of mobility measures in musculoskeletal conditions on lower extremities in outpatient rehabilitation settings.下肢肌肉骨骼疾病在门诊康复环境中移动性测量变化的敏感性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(11):1268-1274. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1424948. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?基于表现或自我报告的身体功能测量方法:在髋部骨折患者的临床试验中应使用哪种?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.016.
3
Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings.测量住院康复机构出院后患者报告的结局。
J Rehabil Med. 2006 Jul;38(4):237-42. doi: 10.1080/16501970600609774.
4
The patient-specific functional scale: validity, reliability, and responsiveness in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal problems.患者特异性功能量表:在上肢肌肉骨骼问题患者中的有效性、信度和反应度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):56-65. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3953. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale.下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版的跨文化适应、效度和信度
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):897-904. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066452. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Minimum important differences for the patient-specific functional scale, 4 region-specific outcome measures, and the numeric pain rating scale.患者特异性功能量表、4种区域特异性结局指标和数字疼痛评分量表的最小重要差异。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):560-4. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5248. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version.意大利下肢功能量表的拉施分析:维度洞察及改进的15项版本建议
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):532-543. doi: 10.1177/0269215516647180. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
The Lower Extremity Physical Function Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Was Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Musculoskeletal Impairments.下肢身体功能患者报告结局测量对有肌肉骨骼损伤的患者是可靠、有效和高效的。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug;102(8):1576-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
Reliability and validity of the Persian lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in a heterogeneous sample of outpatients with lower limb musculoskeletal disorders.下肢功能量表(LEFS)在下肢肌肉骨骼疾病门诊患者异质样本中的可靠性和有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(1):10-5. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.775361. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity.西班牙下肢功能量表:一种用于评估下肢肌肉骨骼疾病的可靠、有效且灵敏的问卷。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):2005-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.890673. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a physiotherapist-led triage and treatment service on WAITing time for adults with musculoskeletal pain referred to Australian public hospital physiotherapy clinics: a protocol for the WAIT-less trial.物理治疗师主导的分诊与治疗服务对转诊至澳大利亚公立医院物理治疗诊所的肌肉骨骼疼痛成人患者等待时间的影响:“减少等待”试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e091293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091293.
2
RECITAL: a non-inferiority randomised control trial evaluating a virtual fracture clinic compared with in-person care for people with simple fractures (study protocol).叙述:一项非劣效性随机对照试验,评估虚拟骨折诊所与面对面护理对单纯骨折患者的效果(研究方案)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 5;14(2):e080800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080800.
3
Responsiveness of monopodal postural stability tests in recreational athletes.
单足姿势稳定性测试在娱乐性运动员中的反应性。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 11;12:e16765. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16765. eCollection 2024.
4
Tensiomyographical responsiveness to peripheral fatigue in quadriceps femoris.股四头肌对周围性疲劳的张力肌电图反应性。
PeerJ. 2020 Feb 28;8:e8674. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8674. eCollection 2020.