Kinnison M L, White R I, Bowers W P, Dunlap E D
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Dec;145(6):1241-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.6.1241.
Hospital costs and length of stay for 86 patients with peripheral vascular disease treated by bypass or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) were assessed. The length of stay averaged 4-4.5 times longer, and the total hospital charge was 3-3.7 times greater, for bypass than for PTA. These charges are discussed in relation to current diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and the allowed reimbursement from the Federal Prospective Payment System. In appropriately selected patients with peripheral vascular disease, PTA should be the treatment of choice from both medical and financial points of view.
对86例接受搭桥手术或经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)治疗的外周血管疾病患者的住院费用和住院时间进行了评估。搭桥手术的平均住院时间比PTA长4至4.5倍,总住院费用比PTA高3至3.7倍。结合当前的诊断相关分组(DRG)以及联邦预期支付系统允许的报销情况对这些费用进行了讨论。从医学和经济角度来看,对于适当选择的外周血管疾病患者,PTA都应是首选治疗方法。