Suppr超能文献

三种膝关节患者报告结局指标的无症状人群参考值:电子数据收集系统的评估及对未来国际多中心队列研究的启示

Asymptomatic population reference values for three knee patient-reported outcomes measures: evaluation of an electronic data collection system and implications for future international, multi-centre cohort studies.

作者信息

McLean James M, Brumby-Rendell Oscar, Lisle Ryan, Brazier Jacob, Dunn Kieran, Gill Tiffany, Hill Catherine L, Mandziak Daniel, Leith Jordan

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

University of Adelaide Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 May;138(5):611-621. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2874-4. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to assess whether the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were comparable in asymptomatic, healthy, individuals of different age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents. The purpose of this study was to establish normal population values for these scores using an electronic data collection system.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference in clinical knee scores in an asymptomatic population when comparing age, gender and ethnicity, across two remote continents.

METHODS

312 Australian and 314 Canadian citizens, aged 18-94 years, with no active knee pain, injury or pathology in the ipsilateral knee corresponding to their dominant arm, were evaluated. A knee examination was performed and participants completed an electronically administered questionnaire covering the subjective components of the knee scores. The cohorts were age- and gender-matched. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test and Poisson regression models were used where appropriate, to investigate the association between knee scores, age, gender, ethnicity and nationality.

RESULTS

There was a significant inverse relationship between age and all assessment tools. OKS recorded a significant difference between gender with females scoring on average 1% lower score. There was no significant difference between international cohorts when comparing all assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

An electronic, multi-centre data collection system can be effectively utilized to assess remote international cohorts. Differences in gender, age, ethnicity and nationality should be taken into consideration when using knee scores to compare to pathological patient scores. This study has established an electronic, normal control group for future studies using the Knee society, Oxford, and KOOS knee scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在两个遥远大陆上,不同年龄、性别和种族的无症状健康个体的膝关节协会评分(Knee Society Score)、牛津膝关节评分(Oxford Knee Score,OKS)和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎疗效评分(Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score,KOOS)是否具有可比性。本研究的目的是使用电子数据收集系统建立这些评分的正常人群值。

假设

在比较两个遥远大陆上不同年龄、性别和种族的无症状人群的临床膝关节评分时,不存在差异。

方法

对312名澳大利亚和314名加拿大公民进行了评估,他们年龄在18 - 94岁之间,同侧膝关节(与优势手臂相对应)无活动性膝关节疼痛、损伤或病变。进行了膝关节检查,参与者完成了一份电子问卷,涵盖膝关节评分的主观部分。两组在年龄和性别上匹配。在适当的情况下,使用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和泊松回归模型来研究膝关节评分、年龄、性别、种族和国籍之间的关联。

结果

年龄与所有评估工具之间存在显著的负相关关系。OKS在性别之间记录到显著差异,女性平均得分低1%。在比较所有评估工具时,国际队列之间没有显著差异。

结论

电子多中心数据收集系统可有效用于评估遥远的国际队列。在使用膝关节评分与病理患者评分进行比较时,应考虑性别、年龄、种族和国籍的差异。本研究建立了一个电子正常对照组,用于未来使用膝关节协会、牛津和KOOS膝关节评分的研究。

证据水平

诊断性II级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验