Freund D, Shachtman R H, Ruffin M, Quade D
Inquiry. 1985 Spring;22(1):33-44.
In contrast to assertions that investor-owned (I-O) hospitals are more efficient than voluntary hospitals, this study finds no significant difference between I-Os and voluntaries where the efficiency measure is length of hospitalization (LOH). The data base used is a national probability sample of hospitals and patients. The analysis accounts for variation in LOH by controlling for hospital characteristics other than ownership, and in particular it utilizes a new case-mix index to control for the case-mix portion of heretofore suggested differences.
与投资者所有(I - O)医院比志愿医院更高效的说法相反,本研究发现,在以住院时长(LOH)作为效率衡量指标时,I - O医院和志愿医院之间没有显著差异。所使用的数据库是一个全国性的医院和患者概率样本。该分析通过控制所有权以外的医院特征来解释住院时长的差异,特别是利用了一个新的病例组合指数来控制此前所提出差异中的病例组合部分。