Verch Thorsten, Trausch Jeremiah J, Shank-Retzlaff Mary
Vaccines Analytical Development, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, PA 19486, USA.
Bioanalysis. 2018 Feb;10(3):163-180. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0176. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Compared with biologics, vaccine potency assays represent a special challenge due to their unique compositions, multivalency, long life cycles and global distribution. Historically, vaccines were released using in vivo potency assays requiring immunization of dozens of animals. Modern vaccines use a variety of newer analytical tools including biochemical, cell-based and immunochemical methods to measure potency. The choice of analytics largely depends on the mechanism of action and ability to ensure lot-to-lot consistency. Live vaccines often require cell-based assays to ensure infectivity, whereas recombinant vaccine potency can be reliably monitored with immunoassays. Several case studies are presented to demonstrate the relationship between mechanism of action and potency assay. A high-level decision tree is presented to assist with assay selection.
与生物制品相比,疫苗效力测定因其独特的成分、多价性、长生命周期和全球分布而面临特殊挑战。历史上,疫苗是通过体内效力测定来放行的,这需要对几十只动物进行免疫。现代疫苗使用多种更新的分析工具,包括生化、基于细胞和免疫化学方法来测量效力。分析方法的选择很大程度上取决于作用机制和确保批次间一致性的能力。活疫苗通常需要基于细胞的测定来确保感染性,而重组疫苗的效力可以通过免疫测定可靠地监测。本文介绍了几个案例研究,以证明作用机制与效力测定之间的关系。还给出了一个高级决策树,以协助测定方法的选择。
Bioanalysis. 2018-2
J Infect Dis. 2016-9-1
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016-6
Microbiol Spectr. 2025-3-25
Braz J Microbiol. 2025-3
Vaccines (Basel). 2024-7-13
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-7-27