Suppr超能文献

肾下腹主动脉瘤血管内治疗后的死亡率——越新越好?

Mortality after endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms - the newer the better?

作者信息

Tzani Aspasia, Doulamis Ilias P, Katsaros Ioannis, Martinou Eirini, Schizas Dimitrios, Economopoulos Konstantinos P

机构信息

1 Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece.

2 First Department of Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Vasa. 2018 Apr;47(3):187-196. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000685. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

Abstract

Although endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) presents a delicate alternative treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with lower perioperative mortality, its long-term efficacy remains a matter of concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the currently reported mortality evidence after EVAR and to examine the possible effect of aneurysm status and the study period on mortality rates. The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were thoroughly searched for studies reporting on more than 1 000 patients with non-ruptured or ruptured infrarenal AAA, treated with EVAR from August 1991 to September 2016. A total of 10 910 titles/abstracts were retrieved and 121 studies were deemed relevant. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and reported on 354 500 patients with a mean age of 74.6 years. Almost all of the studies referred to elective EVAR and the mean aneurysm size was 5.58 cm. The most common early complication for elective EVAR was perioperative bleeding (1.9 %), whereas hospital-acquired pneumonia was a major concern in urgent EVAR (28.5 %). Conversion rate to open surgery was 1.2 %. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 4.84 % (1.7 % for non- ruptured aneurysms, 33.8 % for ruptured aneurysms).The overall all-cause late mortality in a mean follow-up period of 23.8 months was 19.1 %. The aneurysm-related late mortality rate was 3.4 %. With respect to the time period of patient enrollment, studies reporting on patients recruited before 2006 were found to face more secondary complications and higher late mortality rates than patients enrolled after 2005.The endovascular treatment of large and anatomically suitable infrarenal AAA in selected patients remains a safe alternative to open repair. Our findings demonstrate that newer studies show better long-term outcomes than the older ones, proposing a possible improvement of EVAR techniques and perioperative care and providing encouraging evidence for a wider application of EVAR.

摘要

尽管肾下腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复术(EVAR)为腹主动脉瘤(AAA)提供了一种微妙的替代治疗方法,且围手术期死亡率较低,但其长期疗效仍令人担忧。本研究的目的是评估目前报道的EVAR术后死亡率证据,并探讨动脉瘤状态和研究时间段对死亡率的可能影响。通过全面检索PubMed和Cochrane文献数据库,查找1991年8月至2016年9月期间接受EVAR治疗的1000多名非破裂或破裂肾下腹主动脉瘤患者的研究报告。共检索到10910篇标题/摘要,其中121项研究被认为相关。26项研究符合纳入标准,报告了354500例患者,平均年龄为74.6岁。几乎所有研究均涉及选择性EVAR,平均动脉瘤大小为5.58厘米。选择性EVAR最常见的早期并发症是围手术期出血(1.9%),而医院获得性肺炎是急诊EVAR的主要问题(28.5%)。转为开放手术的比例为1.2%。30天全因死亡率为4.84%(非破裂动脉瘤为1.7%,破裂动脉瘤为33.8%)。平均随访23.8个月的总体全因晚期死亡率为19.1%。动脉瘤相关晚期死亡率为3.4%。关于患者入组时间段,发现2006年前入组患者的研究面临更多的继发性并发症和更高的晚期死亡率,高于2005年后入组的患者。对选定患者的大型且解剖结构合适的肾下腹主动脉瘤进行血管内治疗仍是开放修复的安全替代方案。我们的研究结果表明,较新的研究显示出比旧研究更好的长期结果,这表明EVAR技术和围手术期护理可能有所改进,并为更广泛应用EVAR提供了令人鼓舞的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验