Suppr超能文献

[原发性高血压患者多级运动时的心血管血流动力学]

[Cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension during multi-stage exercise].

作者信息

Yasuda M, Komatsu H, Yoshimura T, Ikuno Y, Oku H, Takeuchi K, Tanaka C, Takeda T

出版信息

J Cardiogr. 1985 Mar;15(1):135-45.

PMID:2933474
Abstract

We investigated cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension at rest and during exercise. Eight patients with borderline hypertension (Group B), 18 patients with sustained hypertension, and 10 normotensive subjects (Group N) were studied. Patients with sustained hypertension were categorized in two groups; 10 patients without cardiac hypertrophy (Group NH), and eight patients with cardiac hypertrophy (Group HH). To assess the cardiovascular hemodynamics, M-mode echocardiograms, electrocardiograms and carotid pulses were recorded during multistage exercise using a supine bicycle ergometer. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously by the cuff method. At rest, isovolumic relaxation times (IRT) in Groups NH and HH were significantly prolonged as compared with that of Group N. The IRT of Group HH was significantly prolonged as compared with that of Group NH (Group N: 0.06 +/- 0.01 sec, Group B: 0.07 +/- 0.01 sec, Group NH: 0.08 +/- 0.02 sec, Group HH: 0.09 +/- 0.01 sec, respectively). Only the atrial filling fraction of Group HH was significantly increased over that of Group N (Group N: 25.6 +/- 12.1%, Group B; 30.0 +/- 8.1%, Group NH: 27.9 +/- 11.3%, and Group HH: 41.4 +/- 13.1%, respectively). The total peripheral vascular resistance (TPR) in Groups NH and HH was significantly increased over that of Group N (Group N: 1600 +/- 224 dyne/sec/cm-5, Group B: 1704 +/- 465 dyne/sec/cm-5, Group NH: 2370 +/- 608 dyne/sec/cm-5, and Group HH: 3290 +/- 1598 dyne/sec/cm-5, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cardiac index, ejection fraction or heart rate among all groups at rest and during exercise. However, the difference between TPR at rest and TPR at a load of 75 watt (delta TPR) was increased in Groups NH and Group HH over Group N (Group N: 558 +/- 166 dyne/sec/cm-5, Group B: 614 +/- 336 dyne/sec/cm-5, Group NH: 883 +/- 415 dyne/sec/cm-5, and Group HH: 1306 +/- 774 dyne/sec/cm-5, respectively). From these findings, we concluded that there is early diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in Groups NH and HH, and that the degree is more distinct in Group HH. It seems that systolic left ventricular function of both groups is normal during moderate exercise loads, and marked reduction of the TPR in both groups during exercise may be caused by marked peripheral vascular dilatation.

摘要

我们研究了原发性高血压患者静息和运动时的心血管血流动力学。研究对象包括8例临界高血压患者(B组)、18例持续性高血压患者以及10例血压正常者(N组)。持续性高血压患者又分为两组:10例无心脏肥厚患者(NH组)和8例有心脏肥厚患者(HH组)。为评估心血管血流动力学,使用仰卧位自行车测力计在多级运动过程中记录M型超声心动图、心电图和颈动脉搏动。同时用袖带法测量血压。静息时,NH组和HH组的等容舒张时间(IRT)与N组相比显著延长。HH组的IRT比NH组显著延长(N组:0.06±0.01秒,B组:0.07±0.01秒,NH组:0.08±0.02秒,HH组:0.09±0.01秒)。只有HH组的心房充盈分数比N组显著增加(N组:25.6±12.1%,B组:30.0±8.1%,NH组:27.9±11.3%,HH组:41.4±13.1%)。NH组和HH组的总外周血管阻力(TPR)比N组显著增加(N组:1600±224达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,B组:1704±465达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,NH组:2370±608达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,HH组:3290±1598达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵)。所有组在静息和运动时的心脏指数、射血分数或心率均无显著差异。然而,NH组和HH组静息时的TPR与75瓦负荷时的TPR之差(ΔTPR)比N组增加(N组:558±166达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,B组:614±336达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,NH组:883±415达因/秒/厘米⁻⁵,HH组:

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验