• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

透析患者心脏导管插入术的经桡动脉途径

A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.

作者信息

Kuno Toshiki, Hirano Keita, Imaeda Syohei, Hashimoto Kenji, Ryuzaki Toshinobu, Saito Tetsuya, Yamazaki Hiroyuki, Tabei Ryota, Kodaira Masaki, Numasawa Yohei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, 284-1 Yobe-cho, Ashikaga, Japan.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):212-217. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

PMID:29335385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural bleeding is associated with increased risk of early mortality during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in patients on dialysis. A transradial approach (TRA) should be considered for these patients; however, PCI operators avoid this approach because of the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). The aim of this study is to construct a TRA system and clarify its safety in patients on dialysis.

METHODS

Eighty-eight consecutive patients on dialysis who underwent cardiac catheterization were prospectively included in this study and divided according to the access site into either the TRA group or the transfemoral approach (TFA) group. Radial access was limited in the opposite side of arteriovenous fistula. The study endpoints were in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates, puncture-site related bleeding complications, and other complications. The study safety endpoints were procedure success rate and RAO rate in the TRA group.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 70.4 ± 8.5 years. PCI was performed in 43 patients (48.9%). The TRA and TFA groups included 62 patients (70.5%) and 26 patients (29.5%), respectively. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 0.0% in both groups. Puncture-site bleeding rates were 3.8% in the TFA group and 0.0% in the TRA group (P=.12). Procedural success rate in the TRA group was 98.4%. Crossover to TFA was necessary in 1 patient due to radial artery spasm. RAO occurred in 4 patients (6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Constructed TRA can be safely used in patients on dialysis. Our study could lead to an increase in TRA in these patients, which would lead to better prognosis and patient comfort.

摘要

背景

围手术期出血与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间早期死亡风险增加相关,尤其是在透析患者中。对于这些患者应考虑采用经桡动脉途径(TRA);然而,PCI操作人员因桡动脉闭塞(RAO)风险而避免采用这种途径。本研究的目的是构建一个TRA系统并阐明其在透析患者中的安全性。

方法

连续88例接受心脏导管插入术的透析患者前瞻性纳入本研究,并根据穿刺部位分为TRA组或经股动脉途径(TFA)组。桡动脉穿刺限于动静脉内瘘对侧。研究终点为住院和30天死亡率、穿刺部位相关出血并发症及其他并发症。研究安全终点为TRA组的手术成功率和RAO发生率。

结果

患者平均年龄为70.4±8.5岁。43例患者(48.9%)接受了PCI。TRA组和TFA组分别包括62例患者(70.5%)和26例患者(29.5%)。两组的住院和30天死亡率均为0.0%。TFA组穿刺部位出血率为3.8%,TRA组为0.0%(P = 0.12)。TRA组的手术成功率为98.4%。1例患者因桡动脉痉挛需要转为TFA。4例患者(6.5%)发生RAO。

结论

构建的TRA可安全用于透析患者。我们的研究可能会增加这些患者TRA的使用,这将带来更好的预后和患者舒适度。

相似文献

1
A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.透析患者心脏导管插入术的经桡动脉途径
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):212-217. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis.经桡动脉途径对严重慢性肾功能不全和/或正在接受透析治疗的患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Sep;34(9):1412-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01387-0. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.038. Epub 2016 May 29.
4
Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗的术者学习曲线:对当代美国实践中开展经桡动脉入路项目的启示
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jun;15(4):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.经股动脉入路完全转为经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可获得相似的成功率,并可迅速减少住院期间心脏和血管主要不良事件。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):345-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A56.
6
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy radial access is safer and as efficient as femoral access.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入旋磨术的患者中,桡动脉入路比股动脉入路更安全且效率相当。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):471-477. doi: 10.1111/joic.12496. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗-桡动脉与股动脉入路:系统分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 1;95(7):E201-E213. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28451. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径治疗具有相似病变特征的慢性完全闭塞病变的比较。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2018 May;19(5):319-325. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.02779.
9
Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的风险评分、原因和临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
10
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):790-798. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Transradial intervention in dialysis patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese nationwide registry study.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的透析患者的经桡动脉介入治疗:一项日本全国性注册研究。
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Nov 14;3(6):oead116. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead116. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Transradial-Transfistula Access for Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Abandoned Hemodialysis Fistulas.废弃血液透析动静脉内瘘患者经桡动脉-经造瘘口途径行心导管检查术
JACC Case Rep. 2022 Nov 23;4(24):101658. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2022.09.024. eCollection 2022 Dec 21.
3
Cardiovascular outcomes of transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in End-Stage renal Disease: A Regression-Based comparison.
终末期肾病患者经桡动脉与经股动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心血管结局:基于回归的比较
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Aug 23;43:101110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101110. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Navigation of a Dormant AV Fistula for PCI in a Patient With High-Risk NSTEMI.高危非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中对隐匿性动静脉内瘘的定位
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Aug 5;2(11):1671-1674. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.084. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Trans-radial percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with severe chronic renal insufficiency and/or on dialysis.经桡动脉途径对严重慢性肾功能不全和/或正在接受透析治疗的患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Sep;34(9):1412-1419. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01387-0. Epub 2019 Mar 22.