Santiago Rogelio, López-Malvar Ana, Souto Carlos, Barros-Ríos Jaime
Departamento Biología Vegetal y Ciencias del Suelo, Unidad Asociada BVE1-UVIGO y Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC), Universidad de Vigo , Campus As Lagoas Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain.
Departmento Ingeniería Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente, E.E. Forestales , Pontevedra 36005, Spain.
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Feb 7;66(5):1279-1284. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05752. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
We compared two methods with different sample pretreatment, hydrolysis, and separation procedures to extract cell wall-bound phenolics. The samples were pith and rind tissues from six maize inbred lines reportedly containing different levels of cell wall-bound phenolics. In method 1, pretreated samples were extracted with a C solid-phase extraction cartridge, and it took 6 days to complete. In method 2, phenolics were extracted from crude samples with ethyl acetate, it took 2 days to complete, and the cost per sample was reduced more than 60%. Both methods extracted more 4-coumarate than ferulate. Overall, method 1 yielded more 4-coumarate, while method 2 yielded more ferulate. The lack of a genotype × method interaction and significant correlations between the results obtained using the two methods indicate that both methods are reliable for use in large-scale plant breeding programs. Method 2, scaled, is proposed for general plant biology research.
我们比较了两种采用不同样品预处理、水解和分离程序的方法来提取细胞壁结合酚类物质。样品是来自六个玉米自交系的髓和果皮组织,据报道这些自交系含有不同水平的细胞壁结合酚类物质。在方法1中,预处理后的样品用C固相萃取柱进行提取,整个过程需要6天完成。在方法2中,酚类物质从粗样品中用乙酸乙酯提取,2天即可完成,而且每个样品的成本降低了60%以上。两种方法提取的对香豆酸都比对香豆酸多。总体而言,方法1产生的对香豆酸更多,而方法2产生的阿魏酸更多。两种方法所得结果之间缺乏基因型×方法的相互作用以及显著相关性,这表明这两种方法在大规模植物育种计划中使用都是可靠的。建议将规模化后的方法2用于一般植物生物学研究。