• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化高度非共面容积调制弧形治疗计划:NoVo 方法。

Optimizing highly noncoplanar VMAT trajectories: the NoVo method.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 30 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America. Department of Radiation Therapy, Radiologie Vechta, Marienstraße 13, 49377 Vechta, Germany. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 16;63(2):025023. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa36d.

DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/aaa36d
PMID:29336348
Abstract

We introduce a new method called NoVo (Noncoplanar VMAT Optimization) to produce volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans with noncoplanar trajectories. While the use of noncoplanar beam arrangements for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and in particular high fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), is common, noncoplanar beam trajectories for VMAT are less common as the availability of treatment machines handling these is limited. For both IMRT and VMAT, the beam angle selection problem is highly nonconvex in nature, which is why automated beam angle selection procedures have not entered mainstream clinical usage. NoVo determines a noncoplanar VMAT solution (i.e. the simultaneous trajectories of the gantry and the couch) by first computing a [Formula: see text] solution (beams from every possible direction, suitably discretized) and then eliminating beams by examing fluence contributions. Also all beam angles are scored via geometrical considerations only to find out the usefulness of the whole beam space in a very short time. A custom path finding algorithm is applied to find an optimized, continuous trajectory through the most promising beam angles using the calculated score of the beam space. Finally, using this trajectory a VMAT plan is optimized. For three clinical cases, a lung, brain, and liver case, we compare NoVo to the ideal [Formula: see text] solution, nine beam noncoplanar IMRT, coplanar VMAT, and a recently published noncoplanar VMAT algorithm. NoVo comes closest to the [Formula: see text] solution considering the lung case (brain and liver case: second), as well as improving the solution time by using geometrical considerations, followed by a time effective iterative process reducing the [Formula: see text] solution. Compared to a recently published noncoplanar VMAT algorithm, using NoVo the computation time is reduced by a factor of 2-3 (depending on the case). Compared to coplanar VMAT, NoVo reduces the objective function value by 24%, 49% and 6% for the lung, brain and liver cases, respectively.

摘要

我们引入了一种名为 NoVo(非共面 VMAT 优化)的新方法,用于生成具有非共面轨迹的容积调制弧形治疗(VMAT)治疗计划。虽然非共面射束排列用于强度调制放射治疗(IMRT),特别是高分割立体定向放射外科(SRS),但对于 VMAT,非共面射束轨迹则不常见,因为能够处理这些射束的治疗机器的可用性有限。对于 IMRT 和 VMAT,射束角度选择问题本质上是高度非凸的,这就是为什么自动化射束角度选择程序尚未进入主流临床应用的原因。NoVo 通过首先计算[Formula: see text]解决方案(来自每个可能方向的射束,适当离散化),然后通过检查通量贡献来消除射束,来确定非共面 VMAT 解决方案(即机架和治疗床的同时轨迹)。此外,所有射束角度都仅通过几何考虑进行评分,以在很短的时间内了解整个射束空间的有用性。应用自定义路径查找算法,通过使用计算出的射束空间得分,找到最有前途的射束角度的优化、连续轨迹。最后,使用此轨迹优化 VMAT 计划。对于三个临床病例,肺、脑和肝病例,我们将 NoVo 与理想的[Formula: see text]解决方案、九个非共面 IMRT 射束、共面 VMAT 和最近发表的非共面 VMAT 算法进行了比较。就肺病例而言(脑和肝病例:第二),NoVo 最接近[Formula: see text]解决方案,并且通过使用几何考虑提高了解决方案的时间效率,然后通过有效的迭代过程减少了[Formula: see text]解决方案。与最近发表的非共面 VMAT 算法相比,使用 NoVo 可以将计算时间减少 2-3 倍(具体取决于病例)。与共面 VMAT 相比,NoVo 分别将肺、脑和肝病例的目标函数值降低了 24%、49%和 6%。

相似文献

1
Optimizing highly noncoplanar VMAT trajectories: the NoVo method.优化高度非共面容积调制弧形治疗计划:NoVo 方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 16;63(2):025023. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa36d.
2
A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories.一种采用非共面轨迹的调强弧形治疗优化的模块化方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 7;60(13):5179-98. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/13/5179. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
3
Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time.鼻咽癌的非共面容积调强弧形放疗:计划质量与治疗时间
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2157-68. doi: 10.1118/1.4914863.
4
Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.非共面容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)治疗脑转移瘤:与共面容积旋转调强放疗、调强放疗和射波刀比较的计划质量和治疗效率。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan 1;18:1533033819871621. doi: 10.1177/1533033819871621.
5
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung tumors: a comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.容积调强弧形治疗与强度调强放疗技术在立体定向体部放疗中的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.014. Epub 2011 Feb 6.
6
A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.容积调强弧形治疗计划的综合方案。
Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4263. doi: 10.1118/1.4953832.
7
Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT.共面和非共面头颈部调强放疗的射束角度和强度分布的综合多标准优化及其对容积调强弧形治疗的影响
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):4858-65. doi: 10.1118/1.4736803.
8
Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multiple noncoplanar arcs.采用多个非共面弧形治疗颅部放射外科的容积调强弧形治疗评估。
Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):5863-72. doi: 10.1118/1.3641874.
9
Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs.比较临近关键器官的高级别胶质瘤肿瘤的多种治疗计划技术。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(9):514-519. doi: 10.1159/000487642. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
10
iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.iCycle:用于生成共面和非共面调强计划的集成、多准则射束角度和剂量分布优化。
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):951-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3676689.

引用本文的文献

1
Organ-at-risk sparing with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: comparison with volumetric arc therapy on a publicly available library of cases.头颈部癌症的动态轨道放射治疗中危险器官保护:与公开病例库中的容积弧形治疗的比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5.
2
Fast stereotactic radiosurgery planning using patient-specific beam angle optimization and automation.使用患者特异性射束角度优化和自动化的快速立体定向放射治疗计划
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 26;21:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.009. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.
比较脑膜瘤病例调强治疗中静态束和弧形轨迹的非共面优化。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021 Dec;44(4):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s13246-021-01061-8. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
4π Radiotherapy Using a Linear Accelerator: A Misnomer in Violation of the Solid Geometric Boundary Conditions in Three-Dimensional Euclidean Space.使用直线加速器的4π放疗:违反三维欧几里得空间实体几何边界条件的误称。
J Med Phys. 2019 Oct-Dec;44(4):283-286. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_2_19. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Proton beam therapy for tumors of the upper abdomen.质子束疗法治疗上腹部肿瘤。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Mar;93(1107):20190226. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190226. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
6
Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours.原发性脑瘤容积调强弧形治疗(DCR-VMAT)中动态治疗床旋转的剂量学准确性。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 5;64(8):08NT01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0a8e.
7
Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy.非共面放射治疗的最新进展。
Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20180908. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180908. Epub 2019 Feb 1.