Department of Dietetics, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan; PhD Program in Nutrition & Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei Branch, Taipei City, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Apr;117(4):301-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Due to studies on calorie requirement in mechanically ventilated critically ill elderly patients are few, and indirect calorimetry (IC) is not available in every intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to compare IC and Harris-Benedict (HB) predictive equation in different BMI groups.
A total of 177 mechanically ventilated critically ill elderly patients (≧65 years old) underwent IC for measured resting energy expenditure (MREE). Estimated calorie requirement was calculated by the HB equation, using actual body weight (ABW) and ideal body weight (IBW) separately. Patients were divided into four BMI groups. One-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analyses.
The mean MREE was 1443.6 ± 318.2 kcal/day, HB(ABW) was 1110.9 ± 177.0 kcal/day and HB(IBW) was 1101.5 ± 113.1 kcal/day. The stress factor (SFA = MREE ÷ HB(ABW)) was 1.43 ± 0.26 for the underweight, 1.30 ± 0.27 for the normal weight, 1.20 ± 0.19 for the overweight, and 1.20 ± 0.31 for the obese. The SFI (SFI = MREE ÷ HB(IBW)) was 1.24 ± 0.24 for the underweight, 1.31 ± 0.26 for the normal weight, 1.36 ± 0.21 for the overweight, and 1.52 ± 0.39 for the obese. MREE had significant correlation both with REE(ABW) = HB(ABW) × SFA (r = 0.46; P < 0.0001) and REE(IBW) = HB(IBW) × SFI (r = 0.43; P < 0.0001).
IC is the best accurate method for assessing calorie requirement of mechanically ventilated critically ill elderly patients. When IC is not available, using the predictive HB equation is an alternative choice. Calorie requirement can be predicted by HB(ABW) × 1.20-1.43 for critically ill elderly patients according to different BMI groups, or using HB(IBW) × 1.24-1.52 for patients with edema, ascites or no available body weight data.
由于针对机械通气危重症老年患者热量需求的研究较少,并且并非每个重症监护病房(ICU)都可以进行间接测热法(IC)。本研究旨在比较 IC 和 Harris-Benedict(HB)预测方程在不同 BMI 组中的应用。
共纳入 177 例机械通气的危重症老年患者(≧65 岁),进行 IC 以测量静息能量消耗(MREE)。使用实际体重(ABW)和理想体重(IBW)分别使用 HB 方程计算估计的热量需求。患者分为 4 个 BMI 组。采用单因素方差分析和 Pearson 相关系数进行统计学分析。
MREE 平均为 1443.6 ± 318.2 kcal/天,HB(ABW)为 1110.9 ± 177.0 kcal/天,HB(IBW)为 1101.5 ± 113.1 kcal/天。消瘦组的应激系数(SFA = MREE ÷ HB(ABW))为 1.43 ± 0.26,正常体重组为 1.30 ± 0.27,超重组为 1.20 ± 0.19,肥胖组为 1.20 ± 0.31。SFI(SFI = MREE ÷ HB(IBW))消瘦组为 1.24 ± 0.24,正常体重组为 1.31 ± 0.26,超重组为 1.36 ± 0.21,肥胖组为 1.52 ± 0.39。MREE 与 REE(ABW)= HB(ABW)× SFA(r = 0.46;P < 0.0001)和 REE(IBW)= HB(IBW)× SFI(r = 0.43;P < 0.0001)均有显著相关性。
IC 是评估机械通气危重症老年患者热量需求的最佳准确方法。当无法进行 IC 时,可以选择使用预测的 HB 方程。根据不同的 BMI 组,危重症老年患者的热量需求可以通过 HB(ABW)× 1.20-1.43 或 HB(IBW)× 1.24-1.52 来预测,对于有水肿、腹水或无法获得体重数据的患者。