Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Centre of Surgical Research, Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):230-238. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000974.
Information is needed on long-term functional results, sequelas, and outcome predictors for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term function postventral rectopexy in patients with external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse in a large cohort and to identify the possible effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details on patient-reported outcomes.
This was a retrospective review with a cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Data were collated from prospectively collected registries in 2 university and 2 central hospitals in Finland.
All 508 consecutive patients treated with ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in 2005 to 2013 were included.
A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms and effect on quality of life was used.
Defecatory function measured by the Wexner score, the obstructive defecation score, and subjective symptom and quality-of-life evaluation using the visual analog scale were included. The effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details were assessed using multivariate analysis.
The questionnaire response rate was 70.7% (330/467 living patients) with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The mean Wexner scores were 7.0 (SD = 6.1) and 6.9 (SD = 5.6), and the mean obstructive defecation scores were 9.7 (SD = 7.6) and 12.3 (SD = 8.0) for patients presenting with external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse. Subjective symptom relief was experienced by 76% and reported more often by patients with external rectal prolapse than with internal rectal prolapse (86% vs 68%; p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 11.4% of patients, and the recurrence rate for rectal prolapse was 7.1%.
This study was limited by its lack of preoperative functional data and suboptimal questionnaire response rate.
Ventral mesh rectopexy effectively treats posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with a low complication rate and an acceptable recurrence rate. Patients with external rectal prolapse benefit more from the operation than those with symptomatic internal rectal prolapse. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A479.
需要了解腹腔镜腹侧网片直肠固定术的长期功能结果、后遗症和结局预测因素。
本研究的目的是评估大量队列中患有外直肠脱垂或内直肠脱垂患者在接受腹侧直肠固定术后的长期功能,并确定患者相关因素和手术技术细节对患者报告结果的可能影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,结合了 2 所大学和芬兰 2 所中心医院前瞻性收集的注册数据进行横断面问卷调查研究。
数据来自于 2005 年至 2013 年间接受腹侧直肠固定术治疗外直肠脱垂或有症状内直肠脱垂的 508 例连续患者。
使用了一种与疾病相关症状和生活质量影响相关的问卷。
包括 Wexner 评分、梗阻性排便评分以及使用视觉模拟量表进行的主观症状和生活质量评估的排便功能。使用多变量分析评估患者相关因素和手术技术细节的影响。
问卷调查的回复率为 70.7%(467 名存活患者中的 330 名),中位随访时间为 44 个月。外直肠脱垂和内直肠脱垂患者的平均 Wexner 评分分别为 7.0(SD=6.1)和 6.9(SD=5.6),平均梗阻性排便评分分别为 9.7(SD=7.6)和 12.3(SD=8.0)。76%的患者报告症状缓解,外直肠脱垂患者的缓解比例高于内直肠脱垂患者(86%比 68%;p<0.001)。11.4%的患者发生并发症,直肠脱垂复发率为 7.1%。
本研究的局限性在于缺乏术前功能数据和问卷调查回复率不理想。
腹侧网片直肠固定术有效治疗盆底后功能障碍,并发症发生率低,复发率可接受。外直肠脱垂患者比有症状内直肠脱垂患者从手术中获益更多。详见视频摘要,网址:http://links.lww.com/DCR/A479。