• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

349 例应用游离胎儿 DNA 非侵入性产前检测及阳性微缺失结果的实验室随访临床经验。

Clinical experience of laboratory follow-up with noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA and positive microdeletion results in 349 cases.

机构信息

Cytogenetics Laboratory, Laboratory Corporation of America® Holdings, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.

Integrated Genetics, LabCorp Specialty Testing Group, 655 Huntington Drive, Monrovia, CA, 91016, USA.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2018 Feb;38(3):210-218. doi: 10.1002/pd.5217. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/pd.5217
PMID:29338128
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Screening via noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) involving the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma has become readily available to screen for chromosomal and DNA aberrations through maternal blood. This report reviews a laboratory's experience with follow-up of positive NIPT screens for microdeletions.

METHODS

Patients that were screened positive by NIPT for a microdeletion involving 1p, 4p, 5p, 15q, or 22q who underwent diagnostic studies by either chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall positive predictive value for 349 patients was 9.2%. When a microdeletion was confirmed, 39.3% of the cases had additional abnormal microarray findings. Unrelated abnormal microarray findings were detected in 11.8% of the patients in whom the screen positive microdeletion was not confirmed. Stretches of homozygosity in the microdeletion were frequently associated with a false positive cfDNA microdeletion result.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this report reveals that while cfDNA analysis will screen for microdeletions, the positive predictive value is low; in our series it is 9.2%. Therefore, the patient should be counseled accordingly. Confirmatory diagnostic microarray studies are imperative because of the high percentage of false positives and the frequent additional abnormalities not delineated by cfDNA analysis.

摘要

目的

通过分析母体血浆中的游离细胞 DNA(cfDNA)进行非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)已广泛应用于通过母血筛查染色体和 DNA 异常。本报告回顾了实验室对 NIPT 阳性筛查微缺失的随访经验。

方法

对经 NIPT 筛查出 1p、4p、5p、15q 或 22q 微缺失且接受绒毛膜绒毛取样或羊膜穿刺术进行诊断研究的患者进行评估。

结果

349 例患者的总体阳性预测值为 9.2%。当微缺失得到证实时,39.3%的病例有额外的异常微阵列发现。在未证实筛查阳性微缺失的患者中,有 11.8%检测到无关的异常微阵列发现。微缺失中的纯合区域常与 cfDNA 微缺失结果的假阳性有关。

结论

总的来说,本报告表明,虽然 cfDNA 分析可以筛查微缺失,但阳性预测值较低;在我们的研究中为 9.2%。因此,应相应地对患者进行咨询。由于假阳性率高,且 cfDNA 分析常不能明确的额外异常,因此必须进行确认性诊断微阵列研究。

相似文献

1
Clinical experience of laboratory follow-up with noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA and positive microdeletion results in 349 cases.349 例应用游离胎儿 DNA 非侵入性产前检测及阳性微缺失结果的实验室随访临床经验。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Feb;38(3):210-218. doi: 10.1002/pd.5217. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory.基于大型转诊基因诊断实验室数据的无细胞非侵入性产前筛查的阳性预测值估计
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):691.e1-691.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
Cell-free DNA screening in clinical practice: abnormal autosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion results.临床实践中的游离DNA筛查:常染色体非整倍体和微缺失结果异常
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):626.e1-626.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
High positive predictive value 22q11.2 microdeletion screening by prenatal cell-free DNA testing that incorporates fetal fraction amplification.通过整合胎儿比例扩增的产前游离 DNA 检测,对 22q11.2 微缺失进行高阳性预测值筛查。
Prenat Diagn. 2024 Jul;44(8):925-935. doi: 10.1002/pd.6562. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Performance of a targeted cell-free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort.靶向游离胎儿 DNA 产前检测 22q11.2 缺失在大型临床队列中的性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):597-602. doi: 10.1002/uog.23699.
6
Cell-Free DNA Screening for Aneuploidy and Microdeletion Syndromes.游离胎儿 DNA 筛查非整倍体和微缺失综合征。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;45(1):13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.10.001.
7
Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: Cell-free DNA prenatal screening should be used to identify all chromosome abnormalities.当前产前诊断的争议 2:应使用游离 DNA 产前筛查来识别所有染色体异常。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Feb;38(3):160-165. doi: 10.1002/pd.5216.
8
Perinatal outcomes following cell-free DNA screening in >32 000 women: Clinical follow-up data from a single tertiary center.32000 余例孕妇行游离 DNA 筛查的围产结局:单中心临床随访数据。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Sep;38(10):755-764. doi: 10.1002/pd.5328. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Challenges in non-invasive prenatal screening for sub-chromosomal copy number variations using cell-free DNA.使用游离 DNA 进行非侵入性产前筛查亚染色体拷贝数变异的挑战。
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Nov;37(11):1067-1075. doi: 10.1002/pd.5161. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in prenatal screening for chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications: a systematic review.母体外周血游离 DNA 分析在染色体微缺失和微重复产前筛查中的应用:系统评价。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Sep;41(10):1324-1331. doi: 10.1002/pd.5928. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical experience of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier screening test in a cohort of 59,771 pregnancies.在59771例妊娠队列中,全基因组无创产前检测作为一线筛查试验的临床经验。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 18;20(8):e0329463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329463. eCollection 2025.
2
The performance evaluation of NIPT for fetal chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection: a retrospective analysis of 68,588 Chinese cases.无创产前检测用于胎儿染色体微缺失/微重复检测的性能评估:对68588例中国病例的回顾性分析
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 7;15:1390539. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1390539. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical value of positive CNVs results by NIPT without fetal ultrasonography-identified structural anomalies.
NIPT 阳性结果而胎儿超声检查未见结构异常的临床价值。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Jan;12(1):e2352. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2352.
4
Efficiency of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing in the detection of fetal subchromosomal microdeletion and microduplication in a cohort of 31,256 single pregnancies.在 31256 例单胎妊娠队列中,扩展型无创产前检测在检测胎儿亚染色体微缺失和微重复方面的效率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 17;12(1):19750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24337-9.
5
Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review.无创产前检测拷贝数变异和微缺失的有效性及实用性:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 10;11(12):3350. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123350.
6
Clinical utility of expanded NIPT for chromosomal abnormalities and etiology analysis of cytogenetic discrepancies cases.扩展的无创产前检测(NIPT)在染色体异常及细胞遗传学差异病例病因分析中的临床应用
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jan;39(1):267-279. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02351-6. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
7
Performance of a targeted cell-free DNA prenatal test for 22q11.2 deletion in a large clinical cohort.靶向游离胎儿 DNA 产前检测 22q11.2 缺失在大型临床队列中的性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):597-602. doi: 10.1002/uog.23699.
8
Clinical value for the detection of fetal chromosomal deletions/duplications by noninvasive prenatal testing in clinical practice.临床实践中应用无创产前检测技术检测胎儿染色体缺失/重复的临床价值。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):e1687. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1687. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Non-invasive prenatal screening for Emanuel syndrome.Emanuel综合征的无创产前筛查
Mol Cytogenet. 2020 Mar 4;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s13039-020-0476-7. eCollection 2020.
10
Genetic diagnosis in the fetus.胎儿的基因诊断。
J Perinatol. 2020 Jul;40(7):997-1006. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0627-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.