• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心进行的子宫内膜癌的微创子宫切除术手术率。

Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.

机构信息

Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):480-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.002
PMID:29338923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6070135/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a quality measure for endometrial cancer (EC) established by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American College of Surgeons. Our study objective was to assess the proportion of EC cases performed by MIS at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers and evaluate perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women who underwent surgical treatment for EC from 2013 to 2014 was conducted at four NCCN centers. Multivariable mixed logistic regression models analyzed factors associated with failure to perform MIS and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

In total 1621 patients were evaluated; 86.5% underwent MIS (robotic-assisted 72.5%, laparoscopic 20.9%, vaginal 6.6%). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with failure to undergo MIS were uterine size >12cm (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.9), stage III (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.49) and IV disease (OR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.22). For stage I/II disease, complications occurred in 5.1% of MIS and 21.7% of laparotomy cases (p<0.01). Laparotomy was associated with increases in any complication (OR: 6.0, 95% CI 3.3-10.8), gastrointestinal (OR: 7.2, 95% CI 2.6-19.5), wound (OR: 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2), respiratory (OR 37.5, 95% CI 3.9-358.0), VTE (OR 10.5, 95% CI 1.3-82.8) and 30-day readmission (OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.9) compared to MIS.

CONCLUSIONS

At NCCN-designated centers, the MIS hysterectomy rate in EC is higher than the published national average, with low perioperative complications. Previously identified disparities of age, race, and BMI were not observed. A proposed MIS hysterectomy benchmark of >80% in EC care is feasible when performed at high volume centers.

摘要

目的

微创外科(MIS)是妇科肿瘤学会和美国外科医师学会为子宫内膜癌(EC)制定的一项质量指标。我们的研究目的是评估在国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心进行的 EC 病例中 MIS 的比例,并评估围手术期结果。

方法

在四个 NCCN 中心对 2013 年至 2014 年接受手术治疗的 EC 女性进行了回顾性队列研究。多变量混合逻辑回归模型分析了无法进行 MIS 和围手术期并发症的相关因素。

结果

共评估了 1621 例患者;86.5%的患者接受了 MIS(机器人辅助 72.5%,腹腔镜 20.9%,阴道 6.6%)。多变量分析显示,无法行 MIS 的相关因素包括子宫大小>12cm(优势比[OR]:0.17,95%CI 0.03-0.9)、III 期(OR:0.16,95%CI 0.05-0.49)和 IV 期疾病(OR:0.07,95%CI 0.02-0.22)。对于 I/II 期疾病,MIS 和剖腹手术病例的并发症发生率分别为 5.1%和 21.7%(p<0.01)。与 MIS 相比,剖腹手术与任何并发症(OR:6.0,95%CI 3.3-10.8)、胃肠道(OR:7.2,95%CI 2.6-19.5)、伤口(OR:3.7,95%CI 1.5-9.2)、呼吸(OR 37.5,95%CI 3.9-358.0)、VTE(OR 10.5,95%CI 1.3-82.8)和 30 天再入院(OR:2.6,95%CI 1.4-4.9)的风险增加相关。

结论

在 NCCN 指定的中心,EC 中 MIS 子宫切除术的比例高于已公布的全国平均水平,且围手术期并发症较低。以前确定的年龄、种族和 BMI 差异并未观察到。当在高容量中心进行时,EC 护理中 >80%的拟议 MIS 子宫切除术基准是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/6070135/6e9d4209231d/nihms-979638-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/6070135/6e9d4209231d/nihms-979638-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/6070135/6e9d4209231d/nihms-979638-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.在国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心进行的子宫内膜癌的微创子宫切除术手术率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):480-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
Prospective validation of an intraoperative algorithm to guide surgical staging in early endometrial cancer.前瞻性验证一种术中算法以指导早期子宫内膜癌的手术分期。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.在接受妇科恶性肿瘤微创分期的患者中,当天出院是可行且安全的。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):186.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review.微创与开腹手术治疗高危子宫内膜癌的比较:系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;46(5):782-788. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.519. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜手术及剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.年龄对子宫内膜癌治疗中手术分期及手术方式(剖腹手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术)的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Prognosis of women with apparent stage I endometrial cancer who had supracervical hysterectomy.接受次广泛子宫切除术的Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌女性患者的预后。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer-Feasibility, safety and lymphatic complications.子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结活检——可行性、安全性和淋巴并发症。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.作为子宫内膜癌的质量指标的微创手术率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep-Oct;27(6):1389-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Divergent Immune-Metabolic Profiles in Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.子宫内膜异位症和卵巢癌中不同的免疫代谢特征:一项横断面分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 12;17(14):2325. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142325.
2
Impact of a Surgical Approach on Endometrial Cancer Survival According to ESMO/ESGO Risk Classification: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in the Northern Italian Region.根据ESMO/ESGO风险分类,手术方式对子宫内膜癌生存的影响:意大利北部地区的一项回顾性多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2261. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132261.
3
Adenomyosis and endometrial cancer: determining its role as a biological contributor or incidental coexistence.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术的体积-结局关系的系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):775-789. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
2
Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.结直肠癌手术中医院及外科医生手术量与治疗结果关系的系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Jun;8(3):534-546. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.25.
3
Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.
子宫腺肌病与子宫内膜癌:确定其作为生物学促成因素或偶然并存情况的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14389-1.
4
Nomogram Based on Immune-Inflammatory Score and Classical Clinicopathological Parameters for Predicting the Recurrence of Endometrial Carcinoma: A Large, Multi-Center Retrospective Study.基于免疫炎症评分和经典临床病理参数的子宫内膜癌复发预测列线图:一项大型多中心回顾性研究
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Dec 23;17:11437-11449. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S494716. eCollection 2024.
5
Surgical outcomes of single-port vs multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜子宫内膜癌根治术的手术效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0314997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314997. eCollection 2024.
6
Advantages of Robotic Surgery for Patients of Reproductive Age with Endometrial Cancer.机器人手术对育龄期子宫内膜癌患者的优势。
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;14(9):1108. doi: 10.3390/life14091108.
7
Robotic Living Donor Hysterectomy for Uterus Transplantation: An Update on Donor and Recipient Outcomes.用于子宫移植的机器人活体供体子宫切除术:供体和受体结局的最新情况
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 17;13(14):4186. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144186.
8
Corded and Hyalinized Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: A Rare Case Treated With Robot-Assisted Surgery.条索状及玻璃样变的子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌:1例机器人辅助手术治疗的罕见病例
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62274. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62274. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Robot-assisted Surgery with Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer: A Preliminary Report.机器人辅助手术联合主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌:初步报告
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Dec 7;13(2):95-100. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_29_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
10
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
子宫切除术后校正的宫颈癌死亡率显示,美国存在更大的种族差异。
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(6):1044-1050. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30507. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Impact of histology and surgical approach on survival among women with early-stage, high-grade uterine cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary analysis.组织学和手术方式对早期高级别子宫癌女性患者生存的影响:一项NRG肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组的辅助分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):460-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
5
Disparities in Surgical Care Among Women With Endometrial Cancer.子宫内膜癌女性患者手术治疗的差异
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):526-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001567.
6
Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian cancer improves complete cytoreduction and survival - A population-based cohort study.晚期卵巢癌的集中式初级护理可改善完全细胞减灭术及生存率——一项基于人群的队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
7
Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care: A Quality and Cost Disparity.微创外科在子宫内膜癌治疗中的应用:质量和成本的差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):91-100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001180.
8
Racial disparities in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.种族差异对晚期上皮性卵巢癌治疗的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1025-1032. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a92011.
9
Disparities in ovarian cancer care quality and survival according to race and socioeconomic status.根据种族和社会经济地位的不同,卵巢癌护理质量和生存状况存在差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jun 5;105(11):823-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt065. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
10
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.