Taweemonkongsap Tawatchai, Suk-Ouichai Chalairat, Chotikawanich Ekkarin, Jitpraphai Siros, Woranisarakul Varat, Ramart Patkawat, Phinthusophon Kittipong, Amornvesukit Teerapon, Leewansangtong Sunai, Srinualnad Sittiporn, Nualyong Chaiyong
Urol Int. 2018;100(3):301-308. doi: 10.1159/000486319. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with different arterial clamping techniques has increasingly been performed to avoid ischemic injury to nephron. However, postoperative renal function remains controversial. We determine the impact of each renal arterial clamping on surgical and renal outcomes after RAPN.
Patients who underwent RAPN at Siriraj Hospital from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed and stratified into 3 cohorts: main-clamp (MAC), selective-clamp, and off-clamp.
Main, selective, and off-clamping were performed in 27, 38, and 12, respectively. Median tumor size and Radius, Exophytic or endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior or posterior, and Location relative to polar lines (RENAL) score were 3 cm and 7, respectively. Longer operative time was observed in MAC (p = 0.002) although estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, and complication were comparable. Warm ischemia time was not different between cohorts. However, number of patients with prolonged ischemia time in MAC were greater (p ≤ 0.01). All margins were negative. Median postoperative and latest glomerular filtration rate reduction were 3.8 and 5.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively without significant difference between cohorts. On multivariable analysis, hypertension independently associated with reduced renal function preserved (p = 0.03). Median follow-up was 18 months.
Our study is the first to report surgical and renal functional outcomes after RAPN in Southeast-Asian population. Based on our experience, clamping techniques does not impact on renal functions and complication rate was low even in small-volume center.
采用不同动脉阻断技术的机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)越来越多地用于避免肾单位的缺血性损伤。然而,术后肾功能仍存在争议。我们确定了每种肾动脉阻断对RAPN术后手术和肾脏结局的影响。
回顾性分析2010年至2016年在诗里拉吉医院接受RAPN的患者,并将其分为3组:主钳夹组(MAC)、选择性钳夹组和无钳夹组。
分别有27例、38例和12例患者接受了主钳夹、选择性钳夹和无钳夹手术。肿瘤大小中位数和半径、外生性或内生性、与集合系统或肾窦的接近程度、前部或后部以及相对于极线的位置(RENAL)评分分别为3 cm和7分。MAC组手术时间较长(p = 0.002),尽管估计失血量、输血率和并发症发生率相当。各队列间热缺血时间无差异。然而,MAC组中缺血时间延长的患者数量更多(p≤0.01)。所有切缘均为阴性。术后和最新肾小球滤过率降低的中位数分别为3.8和5.3 mL/min/1.73 m²,各队列间无显著差异。多变量分析显示,高血压与保留的肾功能降低独立相关(p = 0.03)。中位随访时间为18个月。
我们的研究首次报告了东南亚人群RAPN术后的手术和肾功能结局。根据我们的经验,钳夹技术不影响肾功能,即使在小容量中心并发症发生率也较低。