• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁括约肌增强和后穹窿成形术后食管裂孔疝复发:中期结果。

Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.

机构信息

Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Klinik Beau-Site Bern, Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6059-6. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6059-6
PMID:29340828
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported short-term outcomes after hiatal hernia repair (HHR) at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we report intermediate-term outcomes and hernia recurrence rate after concomitant MSA and HHR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent repair of a hiatal hernia 3 cm or larger at the time of MSA implantation between May 2009 and December 2015. The primary endpoint was hiatal hernia recurrence identified by routine postoperative videoesophagography or endoscopy. Recurrence was defined by a 2 cm or greater upward displacement of the stomach through the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus. Secondary endpoints included cessation of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), persistent dysphagia requiring intervention, and GERD health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) scores 1 year from surgery.

RESULTS

During the study period, 47 of 53 (89%) patients underwent concomitant MSA with HHR and complied with surveillance. Hiatal hernias ranged from 3 to 7 cm (mean 4 ± 1). Mean clinical follow-up time was 19 months (range 1-39). GERD-HRQL score decreased from 20.3 to 3.1 (p < .001), 89% of patients remained off PPIs, and 97% of patients reported improvement or resolution of symptoms. Two recurrent hiatal hernias were identified on surveillance imaging for a recurrence rate of 4.3% at a mean 18 (± 10) months after initial operation. Persistent dysphagia occurred in 13% (6/47) over the first year, which resolved after a single balloon dilation in 67% (4/6). Two patients elected for device removal due to dilation-refractory dysphagia and persistent reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant magnetic sphincter augmentation and hiatal hernia repair in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a moderate-sized hiatal hernia demonstrates durable subjective reflux control and an acceptable hiatal hernia recurrence rate at 1- to 2-year follow-up.

摘要

背景

我们之前报道过胃食管反流病(GERD)患者行磁括约肌增强术(MSA)时同时行食管裂孔疝修补术(HHR)的短期结果。在此,我们报告了 MSA 和 HHR 同时进行的中期结果和疝复发率。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 5 月至 2015 年 12 月期间行 MSA 植入术且裂孔疝大于或等于 3cm 的患者。主要终点是通过常规术后食管录像或内镜检查发现的食管裂孔疝复发。复发定义为胃通过膈食管裂孔向上移动 2cm 或以上。次要终点包括质子泵抑制剂(PPI)停药、需要干预的持续性吞咽困难以及手术 1 年后 GERD 健康相关生活质量(HRQL)评分。

结果

研究期间,53 例患者中有 47 例(89%)行 MSA 联合 HHR 治疗并接受了随访。裂孔疝大小为 3-7cm(平均 4±1cm)。平均临床随访时间为 19 个月(范围 1-39 个月)。GERD-HRQL 评分从 20.3 降至 3.1(p<0.001),89%的患者停止使用 PPI,97%的患者报告症状改善或缓解。2 例患者在初始手术后 18(±10)个月的随访影像学检查中发现复发疝,复发率为 4.3%。最初 1 年内有 13%(6/47)的患者出现持续性吞咽困难,67%(4/6)的患者经单次球囊扩张后缓解。2 例患者因扩张后吞咽困难和持续性反流症状而选择取出设备。

结论

胃食管反流病和中等大小食管裂孔疝患者行 MSA 联合 HHR 治疗,术后 1-2 年具有持久的主观反流控制和可接受的食管裂孔疝复发率。

相似文献

1
Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes.磁括约肌增强和后穹窿成形术后食管裂孔疝复发:中期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3374-3379. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6059-6. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
2
Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.磁括约肌增强术治疗大型食管裂孔疝患者的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2096-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5204-3. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
3
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with hiatal hernia: clinical outcome and patterns of recurrence.磁括约肌增强术(MSA)治疗食管裂孔疝患者:临床结果和复发模式。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1835-1846. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06950-4. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.在磁括约肌增强手术中,膈裂孔的最小化与强制性解剖。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):782-788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6343-5. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
5
Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.200 例巨大食管裂孔疝患者行 LINX 磁括约肌增强术的前瞻性评估结果良好。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1762-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5859-4. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Magnetic sphincter augmentation with hiatal hernia repair: long term outcomes.磁括约肌增强术联合食管裂孔疝修补术:长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5607-5612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08063-9. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center.100 例连续患者采用磁括约肌增强术治疗胃食管反流病:来自单一中心的 6 年临床经验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):577-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
8
Short-Term Outcomes Predict Long-Term Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation.短期结局可预测接受腹腔镜磁括约肌增强术患者的长期满意度。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):198-202. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0598. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.影响磁括约肌增强术治疗慢性胃食管反流病疗效的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):405-412. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5696-5. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
10
Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Fundoplication and Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for the Treatment of Medically Refractory GERD.腹腔镜胃底折叠术与磁括约肌增强术治疗药物难治性胃食管反流病的对比分析
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1762-1767.

引用本文的文献

1
The failure pattern for the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: a single-institution case series with literature review.磁性括约肌增强装置的失效模式:一项单机构病例系列研究及文献综述
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11842-x.
2
Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病磁括约肌增强术的安全性概况
Front Surg. 2023 Nov 7;10:1293270. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1293270. eCollection 2023.
3
Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: an assessment of etiology, clinical presentation, and management.

本文引用的文献

1
Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation.200 例巨大食管裂孔疝患者行 LINX 磁括约肌增强术的前瞻性评估结果良好。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1762-1768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5859-4. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
A Modern Magnetic Implant for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.一种用于胃食管反流病的现代磁性植入物。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;15(9):1326-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.019. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
3
Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.
磁性括约肌增强装置的取出:病因、临床表现和处理的评估。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3769-3779. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09878-y. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
4
Clinical efficacy and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF2) in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.磁括约肌增强术(MSA)和经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF2)治疗难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E583-E598. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-2944. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
LINX reflux management system to bridge the "treatment gap" in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review of 35 studies.LINX反流管理系统填补胃食管反流病“治疗缺口”:35项研究的系统评价
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Jan 26;8(2):294-305. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.294.
6
Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.系统评价磁增强下食管括约肌在胃食管反流病中的引入和评估。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):44-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11391. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Removing the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: operative management and outcomes.移除磁性括约肌增强装置:手术管理和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2663-2669. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6544-y. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
8
Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies.用于胃食管反流病的磁性括约肌增强术:临床研究综述
Updates Surg. 2018 Sep;70(3):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0569-6. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery.在磁括约肌增强手术中,膈裂孔的最小化与强制性解剖。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):782-788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6343-5. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
磁括约肌增强术治疗大型食管裂孔疝患者的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2096-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5204-3. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.多机构采用磁括约肌增强术与nissen胃底折叠术治疗慢性胃食管反流病的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3289-96. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4659-y. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
5
Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.费用、结局及并发症:磁括约肌增强术与腹腔镜下尼森胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3225-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4635-6. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术中补片与缝合修复盆底成形术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Surg. 2016 Jan;211(1):226-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
7
Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation vs Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 100 Patients.腹腔镜磁括约肌增强术与腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术:100例患者的配对分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux.磁括约肌增强装置治疗胃食管反流病患者的长期疗效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;14(5):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
9
Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study.临床实践中磁括约肌增强术和胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的一年结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1123-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3772-7. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
10
Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝:缝线修补与可吸收补片修补及不可吸收补片修补的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000842.