Repko G R, Cooper R
J Clin Psychol. 1985 Nov;41(6):867-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198511)41:6<867::aid-jclp2270410624>3.0.co;2-d.
This study investigated information derived from a group of 100 Workers' Compensation cases and used clinical opinion and psychological testing to determine the presence and nature of personality disorder diagnosis. Tests used were the MMPI and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Patients were divided according to categories of presenting complaint. Significant differences were found on both the MMPI and the Millon among the diagnostic groups of personality disorders. The authors cautioned about the use of the Millon Test because of the extremely high numbers of personality disorders suggested by that test. In the discussion, attention was called to the complexities of personality disorder diagnosis when Axis I and Axis II diagnoses are present.
本研究调查了来自100例工伤赔偿案件的信息,并运用临床意见和心理测试来确定人格障碍诊断的存在及性质。所使用的测试为明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)和米隆临床多轴问卷。患者根据主诉类别进行划分。在人格障碍诊断组中,MMPI和米隆测试均发现了显著差异。由于米隆测试显示出极高的人格障碍数量,作者对该测试的使用提出了警示。在讨论中,人们注意到当存在轴I和轴II诊断时人格障碍诊断的复杂性。