• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰和纽约州心脏血运重建的临床结果与成本

Clinical outcomes and costs of cardiac revascularisation in England and New York state.

作者信息

Leyva Francisco, Qiu Tian, Evison Felicity, Christoforou Christopher, McNulty David, Ludman Peter, Ray Daniel

机构信息

Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Quality and Outcomes Research Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2018 Jan 3;5(1):e000704. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000704. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2017-000704
PMID:29344378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5761281/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare expenditure per-capita in the USA is higher than in England. We hypothesised that clinical outcomes after cardiac revascularisation are better in the USA. We compared costs and outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in England and New York State (NYS).

METHODS

Costs and total mortality were assessed using the Hospital Episode Statistics for England and the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System for NYS. Outcomes after a first CABG or PCI were assessed in patients undergoing a first CABG (n=142 969) or PCI (n=431 416).

RESULTS

After CABG, crude total mortality in England was 0.72% lower at 30 days and 3.68% lower at 1 year (both P<0.001). After PCI, crude total mortality was 0.35% lower at 30 days and 3.55% lower at 1 year (both P<0.001). No differences emerged in total mortality at 30 days after either CABG (England: HR 1.02,95% CI 0.94 to 1.10) or PCI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.09) after covariate adjustment. At 1 year, adjusted total mortality was lower in England after both CABG (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.78) and PCI (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.68). After adjustment for cost-to-charge ratios and purchasing power parities, costs in NYS amounted to uplifts of 3.8-fold for CABG and 3.6-fold for PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Total mortality after CABG and PCI was similar at 30 days and lower in England at 1 year. Costs were approximately fourfold higher in NYS.

摘要

目的

美国人均医疗保健支出高于英国。我们假设美国心脏血运重建后的临床结局更好。我们比较了英格兰和纽约州(NYS)接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的成本和结局。

方法

使用英格兰的医院事件统计数据和纽约州的全州规划与研究合作系统评估成本和总死亡率。对首次接受CABG(n = 142969)或PCI(n = 431416)的患者评估首次CABG或PCI后的结局。

结果

CABG后,英格兰30天的粗总死亡率低0.72%,1年时低3.68%(均P<0.001)。PCI后,30天的粗总死亡率低0.35%,1年时低3.55%(均P<0.001)。在进行协变量调整后,CABG(英格兰:HR 1.02,95%CI 0.94至1.10)或PCI(HR 1.04,95%CI 0.99至1.09)后30天的总死亡率均无差异。1年时,CABG(HR 0.74,95%CI 0.71至0.78)和PCI(HR 0.66,95%CI 0.65至0.68)后英格兰的调整后总死亡率均较低。在对成本收费比和购买力平价进行调整后,纽约州CABG的成本提高了3.8倍,PCI的成本提高了3.6倍。

结论

CABG和PCI后30天的总死亡率相似,1年时英格兰的总死亡率较低。纽约州的成本大约高出四倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/5761281/0da1efb1ff88/openhrt-2017-000704f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/5761281/0da1efb1ff88/openhrt-2017-000704f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/5761281/0da1efb1ff88/openhrt-2017-000704f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes and costs of cardiac revascularisation in England and New York state.英格兰和纽约州心脏血运重建的临床结果与成本
Open Heart. 2018 Jan 3;5(1):e000704. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000704. eCollection 2018.
2
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.从荷兰视角看经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与搭桥手术的成本效益
Heart. 2015 Dec;101(24):1980-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307578. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
5
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗 3 支血管病变或左主干病变患者的成本效益:紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验的最终结果。
Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).自报健康状况与不良事件之间的关联:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3017-3029. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02573-8. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (5-year outcomes of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在需要透析的终末期肾病患者中的比较(CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG 登记研究队列-2 的 5 年结果)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
10
Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的临床特征和早期死亡率:来自澳大利亚和新西兰心脏与胸外科医师协会(ASCTS)和墨尔本介入治疗组(MIG)登记处的见解。
Heart Lung Circ. 2009 Jun;18(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
2
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2015年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
International comparison of treatment and long-term outcomes for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA and Goteborg, Sweden.
老年急性心肌梗死的治疗和长期结局的国际比较:美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯/圣保罗和瑞典哥德堡。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Nov;34(41):3191-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht196. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
4
Higher US branded drug prices and spending compared to other countries may stem partly from quick uptake of new drugs.与其他国家相比,美国的品牌药物价格更高,支出也更多,这可能部分源于新药的快速普及。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):753-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0920.
5
What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study.在急性心肌梗死死亡率方面表现出色的医院有何不同?一项定性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 15;154(6):384-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00003.
6
Trends in coronary revascularization in the United States from 2001 to 2009: recent declines in percutaneous coronary intervention volumes.2001年至2009年美国冠状动脉血运重建趋势:近期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗量的下降
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):193-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.958744. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
7
Hospital cost of care, quality of care, and readmission rates: penny wise and pound foolish?医院护理成本、护理质量和再入院率:因小失大?
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 22;170(4):340-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.511.
8
Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state.技术发展与医疗生产力:血管成形术在纽约州的推广
J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):187-217. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00125-X.
9
Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).急性冠状动脉综合征的管理。实践与结局的差异;全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)的结果
Eur Heart J. 2002 Aug;23(15):1177-89. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.3081.