Brown Ted, Gutman Sharon A, Ho Yuh-Shan
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Programs in Occupational Therapy, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Aug;65(4):249-258. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12453. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Bibliometrics refers to the collection and measurement of publishing and citation data configurations with the goal of quantifying the influence of scholarly activities. Advantages of bibliometrics include the generation of quantitative indicators of impact, productivity, quality and collaboration. Those parties who benefit from the results of bibliometric analysis include researchers, educators, journal publishers, employers and research funding bodies.
A bibliometric analysis was completed of peer-reviewed literature from 1991 to 2015, written by Australian occupational therapists (who were able to be identified as such), and indexed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-Expanded) or the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) databases. "Occupational therapy" and "occupational therapist(s)" were used as keywords to search journal articles' publication title, abstract, author details, keywords and KeyWord Plus.
Between 1991 and 2015, 752 peer-reviewed journal articles were published by Australian occupational therapy authors. On average, those articles had 3.7 authors, 35 references, and were nine pages in length. The top four journals in which Australian occupational therapists published were Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, and Physical and Occupational Therapy in Paediatrics. The four Australian institutions that generated the largest number of occupational therapy articles were the University of Queensland, University of Sydney, La Trobe University, and Monash University. The top four countries with whom Australian authors collaborated in manuscript writing were the United Kingdom, United States, Canada and Sweden.
The volume of occupational therapy peer-reviewed literature has grown over the last two decades. Australian authors have and continue to make significant contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge nationally and internationally.
文献计量学是指对出版和引用数据配置进行收集与计量,目的是量化学术活动的影响力。文献计量学的优势包括生成关于影响力、生产力、质量和合作的量化指标。受益于文献计量分析结果的各方包括研究人员、教育工作者、期刊出版商、雇主和研究资助机构。
对1991年至2015年由澳大利亚职业治疗师撰写(能够被识别为此类)并被收录在《科学引文索引扩展版》(SCI-Expanded)或《社会科学引文索引》(SSCI)数据库中的同行评议文献进行了文献计量分析。使用“职业治疗”和“职业治疗师”作为关键词,在期刊文章的标题、摘要、作者详情、关键词和关键词加字段中进行搜索。
1991年至2015年期间,澳大利亚职业治疗师作者发表了752篇同行评议期刊文章。这些文章平均有3.7位作者、35篇参考文献,长度为9页。澳大利亚职业治疗师发表文章最多的前四种期刊是《澳大利亚职业治疗杂志》《英国职业治疗杂志》《美国职业治疗杂志》和《儿科物理与职业治疗》。产出职业治疗文章数量最多的四个澳大利亚机构是昆士兰大学、悉尼大学、拉筹伯大学和莫纳什大学。在论文撰写方面与澳大利亚作者合作最多的前四个国家是英国、美国、加拿大和瑞典。
在过去二十年中,职业治疗领域同行评议文献的数量有所增长。澳大利亚作者已经并将继续在国内和国际上对职业治疗知识体系做出重大贡献。