Fujishima F, Taniyama Y, Nakamura Y, Okamoto H, Ozawa Y, Ito K, Ishida H, Konno-Kumagai T, Kasajima A, Taniuchi S, Watanabe M, Kamei T, Sasano H
Department of Pathology.
Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine.
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jul 1;31(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox141.
In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who are treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), identification of the presence or absence of residual or recurrent carcinoma is usually pivotal in their clinical management. In addition, the extent of carcinoma invasion into the esophageal wall could determine the clinical outcome of these patients following CRT. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the response to CRT both macroscopically and histologically in a consecutive series of 42 ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy following curative esophageal resection at Tohoku University Hospital between August 2011 and December 2012. The histological grading of tumor regression was as follows: grade 3, markedly effective (no viable residual tumor cells); grade 2, moderately effective (residual tumor cells in less than one-third of the tumor); grade 1, slightly effective (1b, residual tumor cells in one-third to two-thirds of the tumor; 1a, residual tumor cells in more than two-thirds of the tumor); and grade 0, ineffective. In this study, we selected grade 2 and 1b cases because they might show a complete response with definitive CRT. We evaluated the presence of any residual in situ lesions and tumor depth in detail. The grading of tumor regression in primary sites was as follows: grade 3 (7 cases), grade 2 (16 cases), grade 1b (13 cases), and grade 1a (6 cases). The concordance rate between macroscopic and histopathological evaluation on the depth of the tumor was 40% (17/42). Among 29 cases (grade 2 and grade 1b), intraepithelial lesions were not detected in 17 cases, and tumor nests were not detected in the lamina propria mucosae in 9 cases. The results of this study highlight the difficulties of detecting residual carcinoma cells using conventional endoscopic biopsy in patients who have received CRT. Therefore, when residual cancer is clinically suspected in patients who have received CRT, the biopsy specimen should be obtained from the deep layer of the esophagus whenever possible. Additionally, close follow-up is required using positron emission tomography/computed tomography, endoscopy, and other radiological evaluations.
在接受放化疗(CRT)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者中,确定是否存在残留或复发性癌通常对其临床管理至关重要。此外,癌浸润食管壁的程度可决定这些患者接受CRT后的临床结局。因此,在本研究中,我们对2011年8月至2012年12月间在东北大学医院接受根治性食管切除术后接受新辅助放化疗的42例连续ESCC患者的CRT反应进行了宏观和组织学评估。肿瘤消退的组织学分级如下:3级,显著有效(无存活的残留肿瘤细胞);2级,中度有效(残留肿瘤细胞少于肿瘤的三分之一);1级,轻度有效(1b,残留肿瘤细胞占肿瘤的三分之一至三分之二;1a,残留肿瘤细胞超过肿瘤的三分之二);0级,无效。在本研究中,我们选择2级和1b级病例,因为它们可能对确定性CRT显示完全缓解。我们详细评估了任何残留原位病变的存在和肿瘤深度。原发部位肿瘤消退的分级如下:3级(7例)、2级(16例)、1b级(13例)和1a级(6例)。肿瘤深度的宏观和组织病理学评估之间的一致性率为40%(17/42)。在29例(2级和1b级)病例中,17例未检测到上皮内病变,9例黏膜固有层未检测到肿瘤巢。本研究结果凸显了在接受CRT的患者中使用传统内镜活检检测残留癌细胞的困难。因此,当临床怀疑接受CRT的患者存在残留癌时,应尽可能从食管深层获取活检标本。此外,需要使用正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描、内镜检查和其他放射学评估进行密切随访。