Plastino A, Rocca M C, Pennini F
Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
IFLP, CCT, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, CC 727, 1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Phys Rev E. 2017 Nov;96(5-2):056102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056102. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino et al., Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper.
本回复旨在反驳之前对我们论文[普拉蒂诺等人,《物理评论E》94,012145(2016年)。1539 - 375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]的评论[奥伊科诺莫和巴吉,《物理评论E》96,056101(2017年)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101]。我们表明,我们论文中的Tsallis概率分布与奥伊科诺莫和巴吉所研究的Tsallis分布不一致。因此,他们的发现不适用于我们的论文。