• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突变选择窗时间可预测葡萄球菌对利奈唑胺的耐药性。

Time inside the mutant selection window as a predictor of staphylococcal resistance to linezolid.

机构信息

Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2018 May;71(5):514-521. doi: 10.1038/s41429-017-0016-9. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1038/s41429-017-0016-9
PMID:29348530
Abstract

To explore if the time inside the mutant selection window (T) is a reliable predictor of emergence of bacterial resistance to linezolid, mixed inocula of each of three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MIC of linezolid 2 μg ml) and their previously selected resistant mutants (MIC 8 μg ml) were exposed to linezolid pharmacokinetics using an in vitro dynamic model. In five-day treatments simulated over a wide range of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC ratio, mutants resistant to 4 × MIC of antibiotic were enriched in a T-dependent manner. With each strain, T relationships with the area under the bacterial mutant concentration-time curve (AUBC) exhibited a hysteresis loop, with the upper portion corresponding to the time above the mutant prevention concentration (MPC; T) of 0 and the lower portion-to the T > 0. Using AUBC related to the maximal value observed with a given strain (normalized AUBC) at T > 0, a strain-independent sigmoid relationship was established between AUBC and T, as well as T (r 0.99 for both). AUC/MIC and AUC/MPC relationships with normalized AUBC for combined data on the three studied S. aureus strains were bell-shaped (r 0.85 and 0.80, respectively). These findings suggest that T at T > 0, T, AUC/MIC and AUC/MPC are useful bacterial strain-independent predictors of the emergence of staphylococcal resistance to linezolid.

摘要

为了探究突变选择窗(T)内的时间是否可以可靠地预测细菌对利奈唑胺产生耐药性,我们使用体外动态模型,将三种耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(利奈唑胺的 MIC 为 2μg/ml)及其先前选择的耐药突变体(MIC 为 8μg/ml)的混合接种物暴露于利奈唑胺药代动力学中。在模拟的五天治疗过程中,我们考察了 24 小时内浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与 MIC 比值的广泛范围,发现抗生素 4×MIC 的耐药突变体以 T 依赖性方式富集。对于每种菌株,与细菌突变体浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUBC)的 T 关系呈滞后环,上部分对应于突变预防浓度(MPC;T)以上的时间为 0,下部分对应于 T>0。使用 T>0 时与给定菌株相关的 AUBC 的最大值(归一化 AUBC),我们在 AUBC 与 T 之间以及 T 之间建立了一种与菌株无关的 S 形关系(两者的 r 值均为 0.99)。对于三种研究的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的综合数据,AUC/MIC 和 AUC/MPC 与归一化 AUBC 的关系呈钟形(分别为 r 0.85 和 0.80)。这些发现表明,T>T>0 时、T、AUC/MIC 和 AUC/MPC 是预测金黄色葡萄球菌对利奈唑胺耐药性产生的有用的与菌株无关的预测因子。

相似文献

1
Time inside the mutant selection window as a predictor of staphylococcal resistance to linezolid.突变选择窗时间可预测葡萄球菌对利奈唑胺的耐药性。
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2018 May;71(5):514-521. doi: 10.1038/s41429-017-0016-9. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to linezolid in an in vitro dynamic model.在体外动态模型中检测金黄色葡萄球菌暴露于利奈唑胺时的突变选择窗假说。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Nov 1;72(11):3100-3107. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx249.
3
Predicting bacterial resistance using the time inside the mutant selection window: possibilities and limitations.利用突变选择窗时间预测细菌耐药性:可能性和局限性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Oct;44(4):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 27.
4
Predictors of bacterial resistance using in vitro dynamic models: area under the concentration-time curve related to either the minimum inhibitory or mutant prevention antibiotic concentration.利用体外动态模型预测细菌耐药性:与最小抑菌浓度或突变预防抗生素浓度相关的浓度时间曲线下面积。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Mar;71(3):678-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv387. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
5
In vitro resistance studies with bacteria that exhibit low mutation frequencies: prediction of "antimutant" linezolid concentrations using a mixed inoculum containing both susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus.对突变频率较低的细菌进行的体外耐药性研究:使用含有敏感和耐药金黄色葡萄球菌的混合接种物预测“抗突变”利奈唑胺浓度。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):1014-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04214-14. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
6
Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to daptomycin and vancomycin in an in vitro dynamic model.在体外动态模型中,用暴露于达托霉素和万古霉素的金黄色葡萄球菌检验突变选择窗假说。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Dec;58(6):1185-92. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl387. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
7
Concentration-dependent enrichment of resistant Enterococcus faecium exposed to linezolid in an in vitro dynamic model.在体外动态模型中,粪肠球菌对利奈唑胺耐药性的浓度依赖性富集。
J Chemother. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(6-8):364-370. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2018.1533267.
8
Bacterial resistance studies using in vitro dynamic models: the predictive power of the mutant prevention and minimum inhibitory antibiotic concentrations.使用体外动态模型进行细菌耐药性研究:突变预防浓度和最低抑菌抗生素浓度的预测能力。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):4956-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00578-13. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
Searching for the Optimal Predictor of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae by Using In Vitro Dynamic Models.利用体外动力学模型寻找肺炎克雷伯菌对环丙沙星耐药性的最佳预测指标
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec 7;60(3):1208-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02334-15.
10
Enrichment of resistant Staphylococcus aureus at ciprofloxacin concentrations simulated within the mutant selection window: bolus versus continuous infusion.在突变选择窗内模拟的环丙沙星浓度下耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的富集:推注与持续输注
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008 Dec;32(6):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.06.031. Epub 2008 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Resistance-Predicting Studies and In Vitro Resistance-Related Parameters-A Hit-to-Lead Perspective.体外抗性预测研究及体外抗性相关参数——从苗头化合物到先导化合物的视角
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;17(8):1068. doi: 10.3390/ph17081068.
2
Evaluation the kill rate and mutant selection window of danofloxacin against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in a peristaltic pump model.评价在蠕动泵模型中丹氟沙星对胸膜肺炎放线杆菌的杀菌率和突变选择窗。
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Jun 3;20(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04016-9.
3
Diverse mutant selection windows shape spatial heterogeneity in evolving populations.
多样的突变选择窗口塑造了进化群体中的空间异质性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Feb 22;20(2):e1011878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011878. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Comparative Study of Linezolid and Vancomycin Regimens in One-Stage Surgery for Treating Limb Traumatic Osteomyelitis Caused by Methicillin-Resistant .利奈唑胺与万古霉素方案用于治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的肢体创伤性骨髓炎一期手术的对比研究
Pol J Microbiol. 2023 Sep 20;72(3):239-246. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2023-024. eCollection 2023 Sep 1.
5
Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with meropenem: In vitro model study with OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.用美罗培南检测突变选择窗假说:产 OXA-48 肺炎克雷伯菌的体外模型研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0288660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288660. eCollection 2023.
6
Mutant Prevention Concentration, Frequency of Spontaneous Mutant Selection, and Mutant Selection Window-a New Approach to the Determination of the Antimicrobial Potency of Compounds.突变预防浓度、自发突变选择频率和突变选择窗——一种新的确定化合物抗菌效力的方法。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 May 17;67(5):e0137322. doi: 10.1128/aac.01373-22. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Evaluation of the mutant selection window of danofloxacin against in an dynamic model.在动态模型中对达氟沙星针对[具体对象]的突变选择窗的评估。 (注:原文中“in an dynamic model”中间少了个单词,推测可能是“in an in vitro dynamic model”之类的表述,这里按有缺失的原文翻译)
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jan 30;10:1107608. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1107608. eCollection 2023.
8
Drug Combinations to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance: Various Correlations and Laws, and Their Verifications, Thus Proposing Some Principles and a Preliminary Scheme.预防抗菌药物耐药性的药物组合:各种相关性和规律及其验证,从而提出一些原则和初步方案
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;11(10):1279. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101279.
9
The Application of Hollow Fiber Cartridge in Biomedicine.中空纤维柱在生物医学中的应用。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 18;14(7):1485. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071485.
10
Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Integration Models.药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)整合模型的药效学参数
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Mar 24;9:860472. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.860472. eCollection 2022.