Suppr超能文献

静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合在新生儿和小儿体外膜肺氧合中的应用:一家三级儿童医院的十年经验

Use of venovenous ECMO for neonatal and pediatric ECMO: a decade of experience at a tertiary children's hospital.

作者信息

Carpenter Jennifer L, Yu Yangyang R, Cass Darrell L, Olutoye Oluyinka O, Thomas James A, Burgman Cole, Fernandes Caraciolo J, Lee Timothy C

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, 6701 Fannin St, Suite 1210, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Critical Care Section, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St, Suite 6006, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Mar;34(3):263-268. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4225-5. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advances in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have led to increased use of venovenous (VV) ECMO in the pediatric population. We present the evolution and experience of pediatric VV ECMO at a tertiary care institution.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study from 01/2005 to 07/2016 was performed, comparing by cannulation mode. Survival to discharge, complications, and decannulation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 160 patients (105 NICU, 55 PICU) required 13 ± 11 days of ECMO. VV cannulation was used primarily in 83 patients with 64% survival, while venoarterial (VA) ECMO was used in 77 patients with 54% survival. Overall, 74% of patients (n = 118) were successfully decannulated; 57% survived to discharge. VA ECMO had a higher rate of intra-cranial hemorrhage than VV (22 vs 9%, p = 0.003). Sixteen VA patients (21%) had radiographic evidence of a cerebral ischemic insult. No cardiac complications occurred with the use of dual-lumen VV cannulas. There were no differences in complications (p = 0.40) or re-operations (p = 0.85) between the VV and VA groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual-lumen VV ECMO can be safely performed with appropriate image guidance, is associated with a lower rate of intra-cranial hemorrhage, and may be the preferred first-line mode of ECMO support in appropriately selected NICU and PICU patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

背景

体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)技术的进步促使小儿群体中静脉-静脉(VV)ECMO的使用增加。我们介绍了一家三级医疗机构小儿VV ECMO的发展历程和经验。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究时间为2005年1月至2016年7月,按插管模式进行比较。进行了出院生存率、并发症及撤机分析。

结果

共有160例患者(105例在新生儿重症监护室,55例在儿科重症监护室)需要ECMO支持13±11天。83例患者主要采用VV插管,生存率为64%;77例患者采用静脉-动脉(VA)ECMO,生存率为54%。总体而言,74%的患者(n = 118)成功撤机;57%存活至出院。VA ECMO颅内出血发生率高于VV(22% vs 9%,p = 0.003)。16例VA患者(21%)有脑缺血损伤的影像学证据。使用双腔VV插管未发生心脏并发症。VV组和VA组在并发症(p = 0.40)或再次手术(p = 0.85)方面无差异。

结论

在适当的影像引导下,双腔VV ECMO可安全实施,颅内出血发生率较低,对于适当选择的新生儿重症监护室和儿科重症监护室患者,可能是首选的ECMO支持一线模式。

证据水平

II级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验