1 Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Int J Health Serv. 2018 Apr;48(2):328-348. doi: 10.1177/0020731417753673. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Growing research on the political economy of health has begun to emphasize sociopolitical influences on cross-national differences in population health above and beyond economic growth. While this research investigates the impact of overall public health spending as a share of GDP ("health care effort"), it has for the most part overlooked the distribution of health care spending across the public and private spheres ("public sector share"). I evaluate the relative contributions of health care effort, public sector share, and GDP to the large and growing disadvantage in U.S. life expectancy at birth relative to peer nations. I do so using fixed effects models with data from 16 wealthy democratic nations between 1960 and 2010. Results indicate that public sector share has a beneficial effect on longevity net of the effect of health care effort and that this effect is nonlinear, decreasing in magnitude as levels rise. Moreover, public sector share is a more powerful predictor of life expectancy at birth than GDP per capita. This study contributes to discussions around the political economy of health, the growth consensus, and the American lag in life expectancy. Policy implications vis-à-vis the U.S. Affordable Care Act are discussed.
健康的政治经济学研究日益强调,除经济增长之外,社会政治因素也会对人口健康的跨国差异产生影响。虽然这项研究调查了总体公共卫生支出占 GDP 的份额(“卫生保健投入”)对人口健康的影响,但它在很大程度上忽略了卫生保健支出在公共和私营领域的分配(“公共部门份额”)。我评估了卫生保健投入、公共部门份额和 GDP 对美国出生预期寿命相对于同等人均收入国家的巨大且不断扩大的劣势的相对贡献。我使用 1960 年至 2010 年间 16 个富裕民主国家的数据,通过固定效应模型进行了评估。结果表明,在卫生保健投入的影响之外,公共部门份额对寿命有积极影响,而且这种影响是非线性的,随着水平的提高而减小。此外,公共部门份额是出生预期寿命的一个比人均 GDP 更有力的预测指标。本研究有助于讨论健康的政治经济学、增长共识以及美国在预期寿命方面的滞后问题。还讨论了与美国平价医疗法案相关的政策含义。