Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, England; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jan;54(1):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.09.001.
The U.S. spends more than any other country on health care, yet Americans have lower life expectancy than people in most industrialized countries. Recent studies suggest that lower expenditures on social policies in the U.S. may contribute to less-favorable trends in life expectancy. This study tests the hypothesis that greater social spending will be positively associated with life expectancy across the countries of the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development and that the magnitude of these associations will outweigh those between government healthcare spending and life expectancy.
In 2016, longitudinal data on six domains of social expenditures for the U.S. and 19 other wealthy nations between 1980 and 2010 were used to estimate the associations between prior year expenditures on education, family, unemployment, incapacity, old age, and active labor market programs, and period life expectancy using fixed effects models.
Controlling for a wide set of confounders and government healthcare expenditures, a 1% increase in prior year education expenditures was associated with 0.160 (95% CI=0.033, 0.286) of a year gain in life expectancy, whereas a 1% increase in prior year incapacity benefit expenditures was associated with 0.168 (95% CI=0.003, 0.333) of a year gain in life expectancy. Counterfactual models suggest that if the U.S. were to increase expenditures on education and incapacity to the levels of the country with the maximum expenditures, life expectancy would increase to 80.12 years.
The U.S. life expectancy lag could be considerably smaller if U.S. expenditures on education and incapacity programs were comparable with those in other high-income countries.
美国在医疗保健上的支出超过任何其他国家,但美国人的预期寿命却低于大多数工业化国家。最近的研究表明,美国在社会政策上的支出较低,可能导致预期寿命的不利趋势。本研究检验了这样一种假设,即更大的社会支出将与经合组织国家的预期寿命呈正相关,而这些关联的幅度将超过政府医疗支出与预期寿命之间的关联。
2016 年,使用美国和其他 19 个富裕国家在 1980 年至 2010 年期间六个社会支出领域的纵向数据,采用固定效应模型估计上一年度教育、家庭、失业、残疾、老年和积极劳动力市场计划支出与期间预期寿命之间的关联。
在控制了广泛的混杂因素和政府医疗支出后,上一年度教育支出增加 1%,预期寿命增加 0.160 年(95%CI=0.033, 0.286),而上一年度残疾津贴支出增加 1%,预期寿命增加 0.168 年(95%CI=0.003, 0.333)。反事实模型表明,如果美国将教育和残疾支出增加到支出最高的国家的水平,预期寿命将增加到 80.12 岁。
如果美国在教育和残疾计划上的支出与其他高收入国家相当,那么美国的预期寿命差距可能会大大缩小。