Department of Molecular Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin , Ireland.
School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;314(3):G378-G387. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00435.2016. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
The intestinal epithelium constitutes an innate barrier which, upon injury, undergoes self-repair processes known as restitution. Although bile acids are known as important regulators of epithelial function in health and disease, their effects on wound healing processes are not yet clear. Here we set out to investigate the effects of the colonic bile acids, deoxycholic acid (DCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), on epithelial restitution. Wound healing in T cell monolayers grown on transparent, permeable supports was assessed over 48 h with or without bile acids. Cell migration was measured in Boyden chambers. mRNA and protein expression were measured by RT-PCR and Western blotting. DCA (50-150 µM) significantly inhibited wound closure in cultured epithelial monolayers and attenuated cell migration in Boyden chamber assays. DCA also induced nuclear accumulation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), whereas an FXR agonist, GW4064 (10 µM), inhibited wound closure. Both DCA and GW4064 attenuated the expression of CFTR Cl channels, whereas inhibition of CFTR activity with either CFTR--172 (10 µM) or GlyH-101 (25 µM) also prevented wound healing. Promoter/reporter assays revealed that FXR-induced downregulation of CFTR is mediated at the transcriptional level. In contrast, UDCA (50-150 µM) enhanced wound healing in vitro and prevented the effects of DCA. Finally, DCA inhibited and UDCA promoted mucosal healing in an in vivo mouse model. In conclusion, these studies suggest bile acids are important regulators of epithelial wound healing and are therefore good targets for development of new drugs to modulate intestinal barrier function in disease treatment. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The secondary bile acid, deoxycholic acid, inhibits colonic epithelial wound healing, an effect which appears to be mediated by activation of the nuclear bile acid receptor, FXR, with subsequent downregulation of CFTR expression and activity. In contrast, ursodeoxycholic acid promotes wound healing, suggesting it may provide an alternative approach to prevent the losses of barrier function that are associated with mucosal inflammation in IBD patients.
肠上皮构成先天屏障,在损伤后会进行自我修复,这一过程被称为再生。虽然胆汁酸被认为是健康和疾病中上皮功能的重要调节剂,但它们对伤口愈合过程的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们着手研究结肠胆汁酸脱氧胆酸(DCA)和熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)对上皮再生的影响。在有无胆汁酸的情况下,在透明、可渗透的支持物上生长的 T 细胞单层中评估 48 小时内的伤口愈合情况。在 Boyden 室中测量细胞迁移。通过 RT-PCR 和 Western 印迹测量 mRNA 和蛋白质表达。50-150μM 的 DCA 显著抑制培养上皮单层中的伤口闭合,并减弱 Boyden 室测定中的细胞迁移。DCA 还诱导法尼醇 X 受体(FXR)的核积累,而 FXR 激动剂 GW4064(10μM)抑制伤口闭合。DCA 和 GW4064 均减弱 CFTR Cl 通道的表达,而 CFTR 活性的抑制,无论是使用 CFTR--172(10μM)还是 GlyH-101(25μM),也可防止伤口愈合。启动子/报告基因测定显示,FXR 诱导的 CFTR 下调是在转录水平上介导的。相比之下,UDCA(50-150μM)增强了体外伤口愈合,并防止了 DCA 的作用。最后,DCA 抑制了体内小鼠模型中的粘膜愈合,而 UDCA 促进了粘膜愈合。总之,这些研究表明胆汁酸是上皮伤口愈合的重要调节剂,因此是开发用于调节疾病治疗中肠道屏障功能的新药的良好靶标。新的和值得注意的是,次级胆汁酸脱氧胆酸抑制结肠上皮伤口愈合,这一效应似乎是通过激活核胆汁酸受体 FXR 介导的,随后 CFTR 表达和活性下调。相比之下,熊去氧胆酸促进伤口愈合,表明它可能为预防与 IBD 患者粘膜炎症相关的屏障功能丧失提供一种替代方法。