Suppr超能文献

胫骨平台后外侧骨折,如何进行支撑?后内侧反L形或后外侧入路:一项尸体对照研究。

Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, how to buttress? Reversed L posteromedial or the posterolateral approach: a comparative cadaveric study.

作者信息

Orapiriyakul Wich, Apivatthakakul Theerachai, Phornphutkul Chanakarn

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

Excellence Centre in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2875-3. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The selection of a surgical approach for buttressing posterolateral tibial plateau fractures is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the surgical exposure area between the reversed L posteromedial approach (R-PM) and the posterolateral (PL) approach using the lateral plateau width as a metric.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty lower extremities from fresh frozen cadavers were included. The R-PM approach was used first and the boundary of the posterior tibial cortex exposure was marked with metal pins. With the same specimens, the PL approach was then performed and the exposure area was marked. After removing all soft tissue, an imaginary line was drawn from the lateral plateau rim anterior to the fibular head (L) to the posteromedial ridge of the tibia (M). Additional metal pins were used to indicate bony reference landmarks at the joint line on the posterior tibial plateau, including the lateral tibial spine (S), the lateral boundary with the PM approach (PM) and the lateral boundary with the PL approach (PL). All distances were measured using S as the reference point.

RESULTS

The average distance from S to L, referred to as the lateral plateau width (A), was 32.62 mm. The average distances from S to PM (B) and from S to PL measured as a percentage of A were 43.72 and 81.41%, respectively. The average R-PM approach blind distance from PM to PL (C) as a percentage of the lateral plateau width was 58.45%, while the distance PL to L (D), which represents the invisible blind distance with both approaches, was 15.37% of that width.

CONCLUSIONS

The PL approach provides better access for buttressing the posterolateral tibial plateau fracture than the R-PM approach. With the R-PM approach, the blind area on the lateral plateau which can be accessed only by the PL approach starts approximately at 43.72% and ends at 81.41% of the lateral tibial plateau width. When a fracture is located in this zone, the posterolateral approach is recommended.

摘要

引言

用于支撑胫骨平台后外侧骨折的手术入路选择存在争议。

目的

本研究以外侧平台宽度为指标,比较了后内侧倒L形入路(R-PM)和后外侧(PL)入路的手术暴露面积。

材料与方法

纳入20例新鲜冷冻尸体的下肢。首先采用R-PM入路,用金属针标记胫骨后皮质暴露的边界。对同一标本,接着采用PL入路并标记暴露区域。去除所有软组织后,从腓骨头前方的外侧平台边缘(L)至胫骨后内侧嵴(M)画一条假想线。使用额外的金属针指示胫骨平台后方关节线上的骨性参考标志,包括外侧胫骨棘(S)、R-PM入路的外侧边界(PM)和PL入路的外侧边界(PL)。所有距离均以S为参考点进行测量。

结果

从S到L的平均距离,即外侧平台宽度(A)为32.62毫米。从S到PM(B)以及从S到PL的平均距离占A的百分比分别为43.72%和81.41%。R-PM入路从PM到PL的平均盲区距离(C)占外侧平台宽度的百分比为58.45%,而PL到L的距离(D),即两种入路均无法看到的盲区距离,占该宽度的15.37%。

结论

与R-PM入路相比,PL入路为支撑胫骨平台后外侧骨折提供了更好的显露。采用R-PM入路时,外侧平台上只能通过PL入路进入的盲区大约从外侧胫骨平台宽度的43.72%处开始,至81.41%处结束。当骨折位于该区域时,建议采用后外侧入路。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验