Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 96900, 2509 JH, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3087-3095. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6021-7. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
During the implementation of new interventions (i.e., surgical devices and technologies) in the operating room, surgical safety might be compromised. Current safety measures are insufficient in detecting safety hazards during this process. The aim of the study was to observe whether surgical teams are capable of measuring surgical safety, especially with regard to the introduction of new interventions.
A Surgical Safety Questionnaire was developed that had to be filled out directly postoperative by three surgical team members. A potential safety concern was defined as at least one answer between (strongly) disagree and indifferent. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparison with the results from video analysis. Two different observers annotated the presence and effect of surgical flow disturbances during 40 laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between November 2010 and April 2012.
The surgeon reported a potential safety concern in 16% (85/520 questions). With respect to the scrub nurse and anesthesiologist, this was both 9% (46/520). With respect to the preparation, functioning, and ease of use of the devices in 37.5-47.5% (15-19/40 procedures) a potential safety concern was reported by one or more team members. During procedures after which a potential safety concern was reported, surgical flow disturbances lasted a higher percentage of the procedure duration [9.3 ± 6.2 vs. 2.9 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD), p < .001]. After procedures during which a new instrument or device was used, more potential safety concerns were reported (51.2 vs. 23.1%, p < .001).
Potential safety concerns were especially reported during procedures in which a relatively high percentage of the duration consisted of surgical flow disturbances and during procedures in which a new instrument or device was used. The Surgical Safety Questionnaire can act as a validated tool to evaluate and maintain surgical safety during minimally invasive procedures, especially during the introduction of a new intervention.
在手术室实施新干预措施(即手术器械和技术)时,手术安全可能会受到影响。目前的安全措施在检测这一过程中的安全隐患方面还不够充分。本研究旨在观察手术团队是否能够衡量手术安全性,特别是在引入新干预措施的情况下。
开发了一种手术安全问卷,需要由三名手术团队成员在术后直接填写。潜在的安全问题定义为至少有一个回答在(强烈)不同意和中立之间。该问卷的有效性通过与视频分析结果进行比较来评估。两名不同的观察者在 2010 年 11 月至 2012 年 4 月期间对 40 例腹腔镜子宫切除术进行了 40 例,记录了手术流程干扰的存在和影响。
外科医生报告了 16%(85/520 个问题)的潜在安全问题。对于刷手护士和麻醉师,这分别为 9%(46/520)。在 37.5-47.5%(40 例手术中的 15-19 例)的情况下,一个或多个团队成员报告了器械的准备、功能和使用方便性存在潜在安全问题。在报告潜在安全问题的手术过程中,手术流程干扰持续了更长的手术时间百分比[9.3±6.2%比(均值±标准差)2.9±3.7%,p<0.001]。在使用新仪器或设备的手术之后,报告了更多的潜在安全问题(51.2%比 23.1%,p<0.001)。
在手术流程中,手术流程干扰持续时间相对较长,且使用新仪器或设备的手术过程中,特别报告了潜在的安全问题。手术安全问卷可作为一种有效的工具,用于评估和维持微创手术期间的手术安全性,特别是在引入新干预措施时。