Department of Philosophy,Duke University,Durham,NC
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001303.
Three serious challenges to Mahr & Csibra's (M&C's) proposal are presented. First, we argue that the epistemic attitude that they claim is unique to remembering also applies to some forms of imaginative simulations that aren't memories. Second, we argue that their account cannot accommodate critical neuropsychological evidence. Finally, we argue that their proposal looks unconvincing when compared to more parsimonious evolutionary accounts.
提出了对 Mahr 和 Csibra（M&C）的提议的三个严重挑战。首先，我们认为，他们声称的独特于记忆的认知态度也适用于某些不是记忆的想象模拟。其次，我们认为他们的解释无法容纳关键的神经心理学证据。最后，与更简约的进化解释相比，他们的提议看起来令人难以置信。
