Suppr超能文献

颈动脉血运重建术后一年的神经心理学结果:一项前后对照研究。

Neuropsychological Outcome One Year after Carotid Revascularization: A before-and-after Study.

作者信息

Casas-Hernanz Laura, Garolera Maite, Badenes Dolors, Quintana Salvador, Millán Susana, Calzado Noemi, de Francisco Jorge, Royo Josep, Aguilar Miquel

机构信息

Servei de Neurologia, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

Departament de Psiquiatria i de Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Vasc Specialist Int. 2017 Dec;33(4):146-155. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2017.33.4.146. Epub 2017 Dec 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to determine the clinical profile of patients considered cognitive 'responders' to surgery in order to establish clinical variables associated with a favorable cognitive performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 70 patients were included in the study. A well-validated, comprehensive standardized neurocognitive battery of tests of about 2 hours was administered. Patients were examined twice, 1-week before surgery and 1-year postoperatively. The criterion to be included in the 'responder' group was the following: to obtain a positive difference between post-revascularization and pre-revascularization neuropsychological assessment ≥1 standard deviation in ≥2 tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (38.6%) were cognitive responders to treatment. In bivariate analysis between responders and non-responders, presence of atrophy (P=0.003), small vessels (P=0.577), symptoms (P=0.046), and age (P=0.030) were the factors statistically significant. When comparing cognitive performance before and after carotid revascularization, significant differences were observed in semantic fluency with a lower performance after 12 months (P=0.004, d=0.29), and in the Language index (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) (P=0.005, d=0.34).

CONCLUSION

Patients without neurological symptoms, of a younger age and without atrophy and white matter small vessel lesions are better cognitive responders 1-year after carotid revascularization.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定被认为是手术认知“反应者”的患者的临床特征,以便确定与良好认知表现相关的临床变量。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入70例患者。实施了一套经过充分验证的、全面的标准化神经认知测试组合,测试约需2小时。患者在手术前1周和术后1年接受了两次检查。纳入“反应者”组的标准如下:在血管重建术后和血管重建术前的神经心理学评估之间,在≥2项测试中获得的差异≥1个标准差为阳性。

结果

27例患者(38.6%)为治疗的认知反应者。在反应者与非反应者的双变量分析中,萎缩的存在(P=0.003)、小血管(P=0.577)、症状(P=0.046)和年龄(P=0.030)是具有统计学意义的因素。比较颈动脉血管重建前后的认知表现时,在语义流畅性方面观察到显著差异,12个月后表现较低(P=0.004,d=0.29),在语言指数(可重复神经心理状态评估量表)方面也有显著差异(P=0.005,d=0.34)。

结论

无神经症状、年龄较轻且无萎缩和白质小血管病变的患者在颈动脉血管重建术后1年是更好的认知反应者。

相似文献

1
Neuropsychological Outcome One Year after Carotid Revascularization: A before-and-after Study.
Vasc Specialist Int. 2017 Dec;33(4):146-155. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2017.33.4.146. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
3
Longitudinal evaluation of neurobehavioral outcomes after carotid revascularization.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):874-81. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.06.032. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
4
Cognitive changes after surgery vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.253. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and cognitive improvement using transcervical stenting with protective flow reversal technique.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;47(6):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
6
Volume of subclinical embolic infarct correlates to long-term cognitive changes after carotid revascularization.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):686-694. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.057. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
Prospective comparison of cognitive effects of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting with flow reversal or distal filters.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(8):834-41. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1060952. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
Neurocognitive changes after eversion carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;27(6):727-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.06.029. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Predictors of cognitive functioning after carotid revascularization.
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Oct 15;405:116435. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116435. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of cognitive function after carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;47(3):221-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
2
Severe carotid stenosis and impaired cerebral hemodynamics can influence cognitive deterioration.
Neurology. 2013 Jun 4;80(23):2145-50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318295d71a. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
3
Carotid artery disease and cognitive impairment.
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov 15;322(1-2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
4
Impaired cognitive function in patients with atherosclerotic carotid stenosis and correlation with ultrasound strain measurements.
J Neurol Sci. 2012 Nov 15;322(1-2):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
5
Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke.
World Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;76(6 Suppl):S85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.023.
6
Carotid atherosclerosis and progression of brain atrophy: the SMART-MR study.
Ann Neurol. 2011 Aug;70(2):237-44. doi: 10.1002/ana.22392. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
8
Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): methods and sample characteristics.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 Jun;24(4):307-19. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp027. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
9
Carotid artery atherosclerosis, MRI indices of brain ischemia, aging, and cognitive impairment: the Framingham study.
Stroke. 2009 May;40(5):1590-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.535245. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
10
The effect of severe carotid occlusive disease and its surgical treatment on cognitive functions of the brain.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Mar;69(2):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验