Casas-Hernanz Laura, Garolera Maite, Badenes Dolors, Quintana Salvador, Millán Susana, Calzado Noemi, de Francisco Jorge, Royo Josep, Aguilar Miquel
Servei de Neurologia, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Departament de Psiquiatria i de Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Vasc Specialist Int. 2017 Dec;33(4):146-155. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2017.33.4.146. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
The aim of our study was to determine the clinical profile of patients considered cognitive 'responders' to surgery in order to establish clinical variables associated with a favorable cognitive performance.
A total of 70 patients were included in the study. A well-validated, comprehensive standardized neurocognitive battery of tests of about 2 hours was administered. Patients were examined twice, 1-week before surgery and 1-year postoperatively. The criterion to be included in the 'responder' group was the following: to obtain a positive difference between post-revascularization and pre-revascularization neuropsychological assessment ≥1 standard deviation in ≥2 tests.
Twenty-seven patients (38.6%) were cognitive responders to treatment. In bivariate analysis between responders and non-responders, presence of atrophy (P=0.003), small vessels (P=0.577), symptoms (P=0.046), and age (P=0.030) were the factors statistically significant. When comparing cognitive performance before and after carotid revascularization, significant differences were observed in semantic fluency with a lower performance after 12 months (P=0.004, d=0.29), and in the Language index (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) (P=0.005, d=0.34).
Patients without neurological symptoms, of a younger age and without atrophy and white matter small vessel lesions are better cognitive responders 1-year after carotid revascularization.
本研究的目的是确定被认为是手术认知“反应者”的患者的临床特征,以便确定与良好认知表现相关的临床变量。
本研究共纳入70例患者。实施了一套经过充分验证的、全面的标准化神经认知测试组合,测试约需2小时。患者在手术前1周和术后1年接受了两次检查。纳入“反应者”组的标准如下:在血管重建术后和血管重建术前的神经心理学评估之间,在≥2项测试中获得的差异≥1个标准差为阳性。
27例患者(38.6%)为治疗的认知反应者。在反应者与非反应者的双变量分析中,萎缩的存在(P=0.003)、小血管(P=0.577)、症状(P=0.046)和年龄(P=0.030)是具有统计学意义的因素。比较颈动脉血管重建前后的认知表现时,在语义流畅性方面观察到显著差异,12个月后表现较低(P=0.004,d=0.29),在语言指数(可重复神经心理状态评估量表)方面也有显著差异(P=0.005,d=0.34)。
无神经症状、年龄较轻且无萎缩和白质小血管病变的患者在颈动脉血管重建术后1年是更好的认知反应者。