Department of Quantitative Health Sciences.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2018;88(2):151-160. doi: 10.1037/ort0000301. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
Chronic stress stemming from social inequity has long been recognized as a risk factor for poor physical and psychological health, yet challenges remain in uncovering the mechanisms through which such exposures affect health outcomes and lead to racial and gender health disparities. Examination of sociocultural influences on group identity, coping, and the expression of stress may yield relevant insight into potential pathways of inequity's effect on risk for chronic disease. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between chronic stress as measured by allostatic load (AL) and depression by gendered race group. Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010 data, we included Black and White U.S. adults aged 18-64 years (n = 6,431). AL was calculated using 9 biomarkers; scores ≥4 indicated high risk. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9; scores ≥10 indicated likely clinical depression. Logistic models estimated odds of depression as a function of AL for each gendered race group adjusting for age and family poverty-to-income ratio. Effect modification was assessed by analysis of variance and relative excess risk due to the interaction. We observed modification on the multiplicative scale. High AL was more strongly associated with depression among White women and Black men than among Black women or White men. In conclusion, a potential manifestation of high chronic stress burden, depression, differs across gendered race groups. These disparities may be due to group-specific coping strategies that are shaped by unequal social contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record
长期以来,源自社会不平等的慢性压力一直被认为是身体健康和心理健康不良的风险因素,但在揭示这些暴露如何影响健康结果并导致种族和性别健康差异方面仍然存在挑战。研究社会文化因素对群体认同、应对方式和压力表达的影响,可能会为不平等对慢性病风险影响的潜在途径提供相关见解。本研究的目的是检验用累积性应激指标(AL)衡量的慢性应激与性别种族群体抑郁之间的关系。我们使用了 2005-2010 年国家健康和营养调查的数据,纳入了年龄在 18-64 岁的美国黑人和白人成年人(n=6431)。使用 9 种生物标志物计算 AL;得分≥4 表示高风险。使用患者健康问卷-9 评估抑郁;得分≥10 表示可能患有临床抑郁症。在调整年龄和家庭贫困收入比后,使用逻辑模型估计每个性别种族群体中 AL 与抑郁之间的关联的可能性。通过方差分析和交互作用的相对超额风险评估效应修饰。我们观察到在乘法尺度上存在修饰作用。高 AL 与白人女性和黑人男性的抑郁之间的关联比与黑人女性或白人男性之间的关联更强。总之,高慢性压力负担的一个潜在表现,即抑郁,在性别种族群体中存在差异。这些差异可能是由于特定群体的应对策略,这些策略是由不平等的社会环境塑造的。