Pennock Casey A, Nathan Cathcart C, Hedden Skyler C, Weber Robert E, Gido Keith B
Division of Biology, Kansas State University, 116 Ackert Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Oecologia. 2018 Mar;186(3):831-842. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4073-y. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
Measuring an organism's movement and habitat use is highly dependent on the spatial and temporal scale of the study, with most studies measuring distributions once a day or at less frequent intervals. Yet, to fully understand the rates of intra- and interspecific encounters among individuals, observations at finer spatial and temporal scales might be necessary. We used passive integrated transponder tags and antenna arrays to continuously monitor habitat use and vagility of three stream minnows; southern redbelly dace Chrosomus erythrogaster, central stoneroller Campostoma anomalum, and creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus, among and within pools of an intermittent stream. Most fish remained in the pool where they were caught and released, or returned after emigrating from the pool. Despite largely remaining within the release pool, distribution among four microhabitats differed significantly over six, 4-h time periods for all three species. Vagility, the summed distance moved among antennas, differed significantly among species. Individual vagility (m day) increased significantly with body length for stoneroller and chub, but not dace. Some individuals moved as much as 110 m day within the pool, showcasing extensive movement at fine scales. Finally, we found no evidence that feeding activity changed as a result of differential habitat use over a 24-h period. Our findings indicate considerable variation in habitat use and movement occurs among species over a 24-h period. This suggests ecologists can broaden the interpretation of processes influencing community structure (e.g., resource partitioning, avoidance of predators) by quantifying species distributions across a range of spatial and temporal scales.
测量生物体的运动和栖息地利用情况高度依赖于研究的空间和时间尺度,大多数研究每天测量一次分布情况,或者测量间隔更长。然而,为了全面了解个体之间种内和种间相遇的速率,可能需要在更精细的空间和时间尺度上进行观察。我们使用被动集成应答器标签和天线阵列,持续监测了三条溪流小型鱼类的栖息地利用情况和游动性;这三条鱼分别是南方红腹雅罗鱼(Chrosomus erythrogaster)、中部岩滚鱼(Campostoma anomalum)和溪鲈(Semotilus atromaculatus),研究地点是一条间歇性溪流的水潭之间及水潭内部。大多数鱼留在它们被捕获和放生的水潭中,或者从水潭迁出后又返回。尽管大部分时间都停留在放生水潭内,但在六个4小时时间段内,所有三个物种在四种微栖息地之间的分布存在显著差异。游动性,即天线之间移动的总距离,在不同物种之间存在显著差异。对于岩滚鱼和溪鲈来说,个体游动性(米/天)随体长显著增加,但红腹雅罗鱼并非如此。一些个体在水潭内一天能游动多达110米,展示了在精细尺度上的广泛移动。最后,我们没有发现证据表明在24小时内,由于栖息地利用的差异,摄食活动发生了变化。我们的研究结果表明,在24小时内,不同物种在栖息地利用和移动方面存在相当大的差异。这表明生态学家可以通过量化一系列空间和时间尺度上的物种分布,拓宽对影响群落结构的过程(如资源分配、躲避捕食者)的解释。