Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):908-915. doi: 10.1111/bju.14139. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
To compare peri-operative outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cT2a (7 to <10 cm) to cT1 tumours.
Patients with a cT1a (n = 1 358, 76.4%), cT1b (n = 379, 21.3%) or cT2a (n = 41, 2.3%) renal mass were identified from a multi-institutional RAPN database. Intra- and postoperative outcomes were compared for cT2a masses vs cT1a and cT1b masses using multivariable regression models (linear, logistic, Poisson etc.), adjusting for operating surgeon and a modified R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score that excluded the radius component.
The median sizes for cT1a, cT1b and cT2a tumours were 2.5, 5.0 and 8.0 cm, respectively (P < 0.001) with modified R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores being 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0, respectively (cT1a, P < 0.001; cT1b, P = 0.105). RAPN for cT2a vs cT1a masses was associated with a 12% increase in operating time (P < 0.001), a 32% increase in estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), a 7% increase in ischaemia time (P = 0.008), a 3.93 higher odds of acute kidney injury at discharge (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33, 8.76; P = 0.009) and a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 10.9, 95% CI 1.31, 92.2; P = 0.027). RAPN for cT2a vs cT1b masses was associated with a 12% increase in blood loss (P = 0.036), a 5% increase in operating time (P = 0.062) and a marginally higher risk of recurrence (HR 11.2, 95% CI 0.77, 11.5; P = 0.059). RAPN for cT2a tumours was not associated with differences in complications (cT1a, P = 0.535; cT1b, P = 0.382), positive margins (cT1a, P = 0.972; cT1b, P = 0.681), length of stay (cT1a, P = 0.507; cT1b, P = 0.513) or renal function decline up to 24 months post-RAPN (cT1a, P = 0.124; cT1b, P = 0.467).
For T2a tumours RAPN is a feasible treatment option in a select patient population when performed by experienced surgeons in institutions equipped to manage postoperative complications. Although RAPN was associated with greater blood loss and longer operating and ischaemia time in T2a tumours, it was not associated with greater complication or positive surgical margin rates compared with T1 tumours. Renal function preservation rates were equivalent for up to 24 months postoperatively; however, 12-month recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in the T2a group. Extended follow-up is required to further evaluate long-term survival.
比较机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)治疗 cT2a(7 至<10cm)与 cT1 肿瘤的围手术期结果。
从多机构 RAPN 数据库中确定了 cT1a(n=1358,76.4%)、cT1b(n=379,21.3%)或 cT2a(n=41,2.3%)肾肿瘤患者。使用多变量回归模型(线性、逻辑、泊松等),调整手术医师和排除半径成分的改良 R.E.N.A.L. 肾肿瘤评分,比较 cT2a 肿块与 cT1a 和 cT1b 肿块的术中及术后结果。
cT1a、cT1b 和 cT2a 肿瘤的中位大小分别为 2.5cm、5.0cm 和 8.0cm(P<0.001),改良 R.E.N.A.L. 肾肿瘤评分分别为 6.0、6.5 和 7.0(cT1a,P<0.001;cT1b,P=0.105)。与 cT1a 肿瘤相比,cT2a 肿瘤的 RAPN 手术时间延长 12%(P<0.001),估计失血量增加 32%(P<0.001),缺血时间增加 7%(P=0.008),出院时急性肾损伤的风险增加 3.93 倍(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.33-8.76;P=0.009),复发风险更高(风险比 [HR] 10.9,95%CI 1.31-92.2;P=0.027)。与 cT1b 肿瘤相比,cT2a 肿瘤的 RAPN 出血量增加 12%(P=0.036),手术时间延长 5%(P=0.062),复发风险略高(HR 11.2,95%CI 0.77-11.5;P=0.059)。cT2a 肿瘤的 RAPN 与并发症(cT1a,P=0.535;cT1b,P=0.382)、阳性切缘(cT1a,P=0.972;cT1b,P=0.681)、住院时间(cT1a,P=0.507;cT1b,P=0.513)或 RAPN 术后 24 个月内肾功能下降(cT1a,P=0.124;cT1b,P=0.467)无关。
对于 T2a 肿瘤,在经验丰富的外科医师于具备处理术后并发症能力的机构中进行手术时,RAPN 是一种可行的治疗选择。尽管 RAPN 与 T2a 肿瘤中更多的失血、更长的手术和缺血时间相关,但与 T1 肿瘤相比,其并发症或阳性切缘率并未增加。术后 24 个月内肾功能保留率相当;然而,T2a 组 12 个月无复发生存率显著降低。需要进一步的随访来进一步评估长期生存情况。