• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实践促进者在改善心血管护理项目中的经验:回顾性案例研究。

Experiences of practice facilitators working on the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care project: Retrospective case study.

机构信息

Clinician Investigator at the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre of the Bruyère Research Institute and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.

Principal Lead of Rowan Research and Evaluation and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2018 Jan;64(1):e23-e32.

PMID:29358265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5962976/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the barriers to and facilitators of practice facilitation experienced by participants in the Improving Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) project.

DESIGN

Case studies of practice facilitators' narrative reports.

SETTING

Eastern Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary care practices that participated in the IDOCC project.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cases were identified by calculating sum scores in order to determine practices' performance relative to their peers. Two case exemplars were selected that scored within ± 1 SD of the total mean score, and a qualitative analysis of practice facilitators' narrative reports was conducted using a 5-factor implementation framework to identify barriers and facilitators. Narratives were divided into 3 phases: planning, implementation, and sustainability.

RESULTS

Barriers and facilitators fluctuated over the intervention's 3 phases. Site A reported more barriers (n = 47) than facilitators (n = 38), while site B reported a roughly equal number of barriers (n = 144) and facilitators (n = 136). In both sites, the most common barriers involved organizational and provider factors and the most common facilitators were associated with innovation and structural factors.

CONCLUSION

Both practices encountered various barriers and facilitators throughout the IDOCC's 3 phases. The case studies reveal the complex interactions of these factors over time, and provide insight into the implementation of practice facilitation programs.

摘要

目的

考察改善心血管护理服务(IDOCC)项目参与者在实践促进方面所面临的障碍和促进因素。

设计

实践促进者叙述报告的案例研究。

地点

安大略省东部。

参与者

参与 IDOCC 项目的初级保健实践。

主要观察指标

通过计算总分来确定案例,以确定实践相对于同行的表现。选择了两个得分在总平均值的±1SD 范围内的案例示例,并使用 5 因素实施框架对实践促进者的叙述报告进行定性分析,以确定障碍和促进因素。叙述被分为 3 个阶段:规划、实施和可持续性。

结果

障碍和促进因素在干预的 3 个阶段中波动。A 站点报告的障碍(n=47)多于促进因素(n=38),而 B 站点报告的障碍(n=144)和促进因素(n=136)大致相当。在两个站点中,最常见的障碍涉及组织和提供者因素,最常见的促进因素与创新和结构因素有关。

结论

在 IDOCC 的 3 个阶段中,两个实践都遇到了各种障碍和促进因素。这些案例研究揭示了这些因素随时间的复杂相互作用,并深入了解了实践促进计划的实施。

相似文献

1
Experiences of practice facilitators working on the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care project: Retrospective case study.实践促进者在改善心血管护理项目中的经验:回顾性案例研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Jan;64(1):e23-e32.
2
A real-world stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular care.一项关于实践促进以改善心血管护理的真实世界阶梯楔形整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 28;10:150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0341-y.
3
Improved delivery of cardiovascular care (IDOCC) through outreach facilitation: study protocol and implementation details of a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care.通过外展促进提高心血管护理的提供(IDOCC):初级保健中一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案和实施细节。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 27;6:110. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-110.
4
The role of the practice facilitators in Ontario primary healthcare quality improvement.安大略省基层医疗质量改进中实践促进者的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jul 30;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0298-6.
5
Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data.改善心血管护理的实践促进:使用基于人群的行政数据对阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验的二次评估
Trials. 2016 Sep 5;17(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2.
6
Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC): Findings from Narrative Reports by Practice Facilitators.心血管护理改善项目(IDOCC):实践促进者的叙述性报告结果
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 23;5:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.018. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Navigating change: how outreach facilitators can help clinicians improve patient outcomes.应对变化:外展协调员如何帮助临床医生改善患者预后。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):232-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110192.
8
Physician perspectives on a tailored multifaceted primary care practice facilitation intervention for improvement of cardiovascular care.医生对一种为改善心血管护理而量身定制的多方面初级保健实践促进干预措施的看法。
Fam Pract. 2016 Feb;33(1):89-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv095. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
9
Practice transformations to optimize the delivery of HIV primary care in community healthcare settings in the United States: A program implementation study.实践转化以优化美国社区医疗保健环境中 HIV 初级保健服务的提供:一项方案实施研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 26;17(3):e1003079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003079. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Identifying Practice Facilitation Delays and Barriers in Primary Care Quality Improvement.识别初级保健质量改进中实践促进的延迟和障碍。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):655-664. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200058.

引用本文的文献

1
Attributes of High-Performing Small Practices in a Guideline Implementation: A Multiple-Case Study.高绩效小型实践在指南实施中的特点:一项多案例研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720984411. doi: 10.1177/2150132720984411.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC): Findings from Narrative Reports by Practice Facilitators.心血管护理改善项目(IDOCC):实践促进者的叙述性报告结果
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 23;5:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.018. eCollection 2017 Mar.
2
A Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing Intervention Can Improve Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Safety Net Clinics.实践促进与学术推广干预可提高基层医疗安全网诊所的癌症筛查率。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):533-42. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160109.
3
Physician perspectives on a tailored multifaceted primary care practice facilitation intervention for improvement of cardiovascular care.医生对一种为改善心血管护理而量身定制的多方面初级保健实践促进干预措施的看法。
Fam Pract. 2016 Feb;33(1):89-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv095. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
4
A real-world stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular care.一项关于实践促进以改善心血管护理的真实世界阶梯楔形整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 28;10:150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0341-y.
5
Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies.迈向通用术语:促进和整合证据纳入卫生实践、系统和政策的简化干预框架。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 1;9:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-51.
6
"My approach to this job is...one person at a time": Perceived discordance between population-level quality targets and patient-centred care.“我对这项工作的方法是……一次关注一个人”:人口层面质量目标与以患者为中心的护理之间的感知不一致。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Mar;60(3):258-66.
7
Primary care quality improvement from a practice facilitator's perspective.从实践促进者的角度看初级保健质量改进。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Feb 3;15:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-23.
8
Practice facilitation to improve diabetes care in primary care: a report from the EPIC randomized clinical trial.实践促进基层医疗中的糖尿病管理:来自 EPIC 随机临床试验的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;12(1):8-16. doi: 10.1370/afm.1591.
9
Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care.反馈差距:以目标设定和行动计划为干预手段,提高初级保健中审核反馈干预效果的实用、整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 17;8:142. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-142.
10
An overview of practice facilitation programs in Canada: current perspectives and future directions.加拿大实践促进项目概述:当前观点与未来方向
Healthc Policy. 2013 Feb;8(3):58-67.