Suppr超能文献

低度炎症标志物谱有助于区分 LADA、经典成人发病型 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者。

Low-grade Inflammatory Marker Profile May Help to Differentiate Patients With LADA, Classic Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes, and Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Health Sciences Research Institute, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.

CIBERDEM, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):862-868. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1662. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test whether differences in serum concentrations of adiposity-related low-grade inflammatory mediators could help to differentiate patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), classic adult-onset type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 75 patients with LADA, 67 with classic adult-onset type 1 diabetes, and 390 with type 2 diabetes. Serum concentrations of adiponectin, soluble tumor necrosis factor-α receptor 2 (sTNFRII), interleukin-6, hs-CRP, and total leukocyte number were measured. To evaluate the differences of these markers among diabetes types, we performed logistic regression models and evaluated area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values.

RESULTS

The profile of innate immunity-related inflammatory markers correlated with metabolic syndrome components. LADA versus classic adult-onset type 1 diabetes was independently related to sTNFRII (odds ratio [OR] 1.9 [95% CI 1.01-3.97]; = 0.047) and hs-CRP levels (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.62-0.96]; = 0.019), and a higher number of total leukocytes lowered the risk of LADA compared with type 2 diabetes (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-0.99]; = 0.036). The logistic regression model including explanatory biomarkers explained 35% of the variation for LADA versus classic adult-onset type 1 diabetes (AUC 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.92]; < 0.001) and 15% of the variation for LADA versus type 2 diabetes (AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.70-0.80]; < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammatory, adiposity, and immune-related markers could help to differentiate a LADA diagnosis from that of classic adult-onset type 1 diabetes, and also LADA from that of type 2 diabetes, along with islet autoantibody positivity.

摘要

目的

检测肥胖相关低度炎症介质在血清中的浓度差异是否有助于鉴别成人隐匿性自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA)、经典成人发病的 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者。

研究设计与方法

本横断面研究纳入 75 例 LADA 患者、67 例经典成人发病的 1 型糖尿病患者和 390 例 2 型糖尿病患者。测量血清脂联素、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子-α受体 2(sTNFRII)、白细胞介素-6、高敏 C 反应蛋白和总白细胞数。为评估这些标志物在不同糖尿病类型中的差异,我们进行了逻辑回归模型并评估了接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值。

结果

与代谢综合征成分相关的固有免疫相关炎症标志物的特征与 LADA 相比,经典成人发病的 1 型糖尿病独立与 sTNFRII(比值比 [OR] 1.9 [95% CI 1.01-3.97]; = 0.047)和 hs-CRP 水平(OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.62-0.96]; = 0.019)相关,与 2 型糖尿病相比,总白细胞数较高降低了 LADA 的风险(OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-0.99]; = 0.036)。包含解释性生物标志物的逻辑回归模型解释了 LADA 与经典成人发病的 1 型糖尿病相比(AUC 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.92]; < 0.001)和 LADA 与 2 型糖尿病相比(AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.70-0.80]; < 0.001)差异的 35%和 15%。

结论

炎症、肥胖和免疫相关标志物有助于鉴别 LADA 诊断与经典成人发病的 1 型糖尿病,以及 LADA 与 2 型糖尿病,同时伴有胰岛自身抗体阳性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验