Basso G, Capuzzo F, Simioni I, Destro R, Gazzola M V, Cocito M G, Cozzi M, Milanesi C, Putti M C, Carli M
Scand J Haematol. 1985 Nov;35(5):536-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1985.tb02825.x.
4 cases of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), diagnosed as null-ALL by indirect immunofluorescence using monoclonal antibodies, were similarly investigated using a sensitive immunoperoxidase method. The Avidin-Biotin system was employed. The immunoenzymatic results were in agreement with those obtained with immunofluorescence techniques for all antigens except common-ALL (C-ALL). The C-ALL antigen, recognized by the J5 antibody, was detected only by the immunoperoxidase method on cell membranes of the 4 ALL. This paper discusses the possibility of false negative results in testing for C-ALL antigen by conventional indirect immunofluorescence as suggested by refined immunocytochemical screening. Moreover, the ability of the immunoperoxidase system to identify antigens on cell membranes, even at very low density, is discussed. The clinical significance of the presence of C-ALL antigen at weak intensity in cases of null-ALL is also considered.
4例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL),通过使用单克隆抗体的间接免疫荧光法诊断为无标记ALL,采用灵敏的免疫过氧化物酶法进行了类似研究。使用了抗生物素蛋白-生物素系统。免疫酶法结果与免疫荧光技术在除普通ALL(C-ALL)外的所有抗原检测中所获结果一致。由J5抗体识别的C-ALL抗原,仅通过免疫过氧化物酶法在4例ALL的细胞膜上检测到。本文讨论了精细免疫细胞化学筛查所提示的常规间接免疫荧光法检测C-ALL抗原时出现假阴性结果的可能性。此外,还讨论了免疫过氧化物酶系统识别细胞膜上抗原的能力,即使抗原密度非常低。也考虑了无标记ALL病例中低强度存在C-ALL抗原的临床意义。