Hand Jonathan, Sigel Keith, Huprikar Shirish, Hamula Camille, Rana Meena
Department of Infectious Diseases, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;20(2):e12845. doi: 10.1111/tid.12845. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Pre-transplant screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a complex consideration that varies by institution. Inconsistent performance of interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) further complicates screening. Data regarding LTBI screening outcomes and test characteristics in a large, foreign-born pre-transplant population within the United States are limited.
In this retrospective study, patients who received QuantiFERON -TB Gold (QFT) prior to liver transplantation (LT) were included. Characteristics of patients were compared by QFT result, and predictors of indeterminate results were evaluated. Similar comparisons were performed between patients who developed active TB and those who did not.
Of 148 patients screened, the rate of positive, indeterminate, and negative testing was 13.5% (20/148), 27% (40/148), and 59% (88/148), respectively. An indeterminate QFT result was more than 16 times more likely in patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease score >25 (odds ratio [OR] 16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-132.0; P = .008) and more than 4 times when performed in our institution's lab compared with commercial lab (OR 4.1; 95% CI, 1.34-12.44; P = .013). The overall TB incidence was 1102/100 000 transplant cases. No patient who developed active TB had a positive QFT. All were born outside of the United States (P = .06) and had pre-transplantation chest imaging demonstrating granulomatous disease (P = .006).
Our experience further highlights the challenges of LTBI screening prior to LT and suggests that QFT may be a poor predictor of active TB in higher risk pre-transplant populations. Candidates should be screened as early as possible to optimize QFT performance, and local epidemiological data should be used to create institution-specific screening protocols in areas with large populations from TB-endemic regions. Management should consider TB risk factors, QFT, and imaging instead of reliance on QFT testing alone.
移植前对潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)进行筛查是一个复杂的考量因素,不同机构的做法各异。干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRA)表现不一致使筛查进一步复杂化。关于美国境内大量外国出生的移植前人群中LTBI筛查结果及检测特征的数据有限。
在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了肝移植(LT)前接受结核感染T细胞检测(QFT)的患者。根据QFT结果比较患者特征,并评估不确定结果的预测因素。对发生活动性结核的患者和未发生活动性结核的患者进行了类似比较。
在148例接受筛查的患者中,检测呈阳性、不确定和阴性的比例分别为13.5%(20/148)、27%(40/148)和59%(88/148)。对于终末期肝病模型评分>25的患者,QFT结果不确定的可能性高出16倍以上(比值比[OR]16.7;95%置信区间[CI],2.1 - 132.0;P = 0.008),在本机构实验室进行检测时,与商业实验室相比,结果不确定的可能性高出4倍以上(OR 4.1;95% CI,1.34 - 12.44;P = 0.013)。总体结核发病率为每10万例移植病例中有1102例。发生活动性结核的患者中,没有QFT检测呈阳性的。所有患者均出生在美国境外(P = 0.06),且移植前胸部影像学显示有肉芽肿性疾病(P = 0.006)。
我们的经验进一步凸显了肝移植前LTBI筛查的挑战,并表明在移植前高风险人群中,QFT可能不是活动性结核的良好预测指标。应尽早对候选者进行筛查以优化QFT检测性能,在有大量来自结核病流行地区人群的区域,应利用当地流行病学数据制定机构特定的筛查方案。管理应考虑结核风险因素、QFT和影像学检查,而不是仅依赖QFT检测。