Körner Ulrike, Röer Jan P, Buchner Axel, Bell Raoul
1 Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
2 Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):457-471. doi: 10.1177/1747021818758239. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
Four experiments tested conflicting predictions about which components of the serial-recall task are most sensitive to auditory distraction. Changing-state (Experiments 1a and 1b) and deviant distractor sounds (Experiments 2a and 2b) were presented in one of four different intervals of the serial-recall task: (1) during the first half of encoding, (2) during the second half of encoding, (3) during the first half of retention, or (4) during the second half of retention. According to the embedded-processes model, both types of distractors should interfere with the encoding and rehearsal of targets in the focus of attention. According to the duplex-mechanism account, changing-state distractors should interfere only with rehearsal, whereas deviant distractors should interfere only with encoding. Inconsistent with the latter view, changing-state and deviant distractor sounds interfered with both the encoding and the retention of the targets. Both types of auditory distraction were most pronounced during the second half of encoding when the increasing rehearsal demands had to be coordinated with the continuous updating of the rehearsal set. These findings suggest that the two types of distraction disrupt similar working memory mechanisms.
四项实验对串行回忆任务的哪些组成部分对听觉干扰最为敏感的相互冲突的预测进行了测试。变化状态(实验1a和1b)和异常干扰声音(实验2a和2b)在串行回忆任务的四个不同时间段之一呈现:(1)编码的前半段,(2)编码的后半段,(3)保持的前半段,或(4)保持的后半段。根据嵌入过程模型,这两种类型的干扰物都应干扰注意力焦点中目标的编码和复述。根据双重机制理论,变化状态干扰物应仅干扰复述,而异常干扰物应仅干扰编码。与后一种观点不一致的是,变化状态和异常干扰声音既干扰目标的编码,也干扰目标的保持。当不断增加的复述需求必须与复述集的持续更新相协调时,这两种类型的听觉干扰在编码的后半段最为明显。这些发现表明,这两种类型的干扰会破坏相似的工作记忆机制。