Sundqvist Ann-Sofie, Anderzén-Carlsson Agneta, Nilsson Ulrica, Holmefur Marie
J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.10.002. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
To translate and adapt the Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale (PNAS) into a Swedish version (PNAS-Swe), evaluate its psychometric properties, and describe registered nurse anesthetists' (RNAs) advocacy beliefs and actions from a protective perspective.
A cross-sectional design was used.
First, the PNAS was translated into Swedish. Next, the content and construct validity of the PNAS four subscales was evaluated. Finally, the PNAS-Swe was used to describe Swedish RNA beliefs and actions regarding protective nursing advocacy.
The final PNAS-Swe has 29 items in four subscales. The RNAs reported that they feel that they should provide protective nursing advocacy for their patients. There were no differences in gender, or associations with age, or work experience regarding their advocacy beliefs or actions.
The PNAS-Swe is valid for use in a Swedish context. Protective nursing advocacy is important to the RNAs, which is in congruence with earlier qualitative studies.
将保护性护理倡导量表（PNAS）翻译并改编为瑞典语版本（PNAS-Swe），评估其心理测量特性，并从保护的角度描述注册护士麻醉师（RNA）的倡导信念和行为。
采用横断面设计。
首先，将PNAS翻译成瑞典语。其次，评估PNAS四个子量表的内容和结构效度。最后，使用PNAS-Swe来描述瑞典RNA关于保护性护理倡导的信念和行为。
最终的PNAS-Swe在四个子量表中有29个项目。RNA报告称，他们认为自己应该为患者提供保护性护理倡导。在倡导信念或行为方面，性别、与年龄的关联或工作经验均无差异。
PNAS-Swe在瑞典背景下有效。保护性护理倡导对RNA很重要，这与早期的定性研究一致。
