Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Royal Brompton Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust, Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):200-206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4974.
Time-updated heart rate (HR) and temporal change in HR (ΔHR) are associated with outcome in individuals with established heart failure (HF). Whether these factors are associated with outcomes in a community-based cohort is unclear.
To determine whether the time-updated analysis of resting HR, defined as the most recent HR value measured before occurrence of an event or the end of study, and ΔHR over time are associated with outcomes in a community-based cohort.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 680 participants were enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort study, with HR recorded at baseline and during 3 follow-up visits from 1987 to 1998, with a median interval between visits of 3.0 (interquartile range, 2.9-4.0) years. The ΔHR was calculated by assessing a change in HR from the preceding visit. Participants were followed up until December 31, 2014, equating to 28 years of follow-up. The present study was conducted from March 2014 to June 2016 with updated analysis.
Baseline HR, time-updated HR, and ΔHR associated with outcomes, adjusted for established baseline and time-updated risk factors and medications. The main outcomes measures included all-cause mortality, incident HF, incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death.
Of the 15 680 participants, 8656 (55.2%) were women, mean (SD) age was 54 (6) years, and 4218 (26.9%) were African American. Time-updated HR and ΔHR were associated with death, incident HF, incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular death compared with baseline HR. For example, a ΔHR from the preceding visit was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15; P < .001 for every 5-bpm increase in HR from the preceding visit) and time-updated HR was also significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12-1.17; P < .001 for every 5-bpm higher time-updated HR).
In a community-based cohort, time-updated HR and ΔHR are associated with mortality and nonfatal outcomes of incident HF, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
在已确诊心力衰竭(HF)的个体中,心率(HR)的时间更新和 HR 的时间变化(ΔHR)与结局相关。这些因素是否与基于社区的队列的结局相关尚不清楚。
确定基于社区的队列中静息 HR 的时间更新分析(定义为事件发生前或研究结束前测量的最近 HR 值)和随时间变化的 ΔHR 是否与结局相关。
设计、地点和参与者:共有 15680 名参与者参加了动脉粥样硬化风险社区队列研究,HR 在 1987 年至 1998 年期间的基线和 3 次随访中进行了记录,两次随访之间的中位间隔为 3.0(四分位距,2.9-4.0)年。ΔHR 通过评估前一次就诊时 HR 的变化来计算。参与者的随访时间截至 2014 年 12 月 31 日,随访时间为 28 年。本研究于 2014 年 3 月至 2016 年 6 月进行了更新分析。
与结局相关的基线 HR、时间更新 HR 和 ΔHR,调整了既定的基线和时间更新风险因素和药物。主要结局指标包括全因死亡率、新发 HF、新发心肌梗死、卒中和心血管及非心血管死亡。
在 15680 名参与者中,8656 名(55.2%)为女性,平均(SD)年龄为 54(6)岁,4218 名(26.9%)为非裔美国人。与基线 HR 相比,时间更新 HR 和 ΔHR 与死亡、新发 HF、新发心肌梗死、卒中和心血管及非心血管死亡相关。例如,与前一次就诊相比,ΔHR 每增加 5 bpm,全因死亡率的风险显著增加(校正后的危险比,1.12;95%CI,1.10-1.15;P<0.001),时间更新 HR 也与全因死亡率的风险显著相关(校正后的危险比,1.14;95%CI,1.12-1.17;P<0.001,每增加 5 bpm 时间更新 HR)。
在基于社区的队列中,时间更新 HR 和 ΔHR 与死亡率和新发 HF、心肌梗死和卒中等非致命结局相关。