• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无导线心脏起搏器 LEADLESS 观察研究的主要安全性结果。

Primary safety results from the LEADLESS Observational Study.

机构信息

Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Benekestrasse 2-8, Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany.

CHU Grenoble, BP 217, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1491-1497. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux359.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eux359
PMID:29365073
Abstract

AIMS

A prospective, single-arm, multicentre, post-market study was conducted to confirm the short-term safety of the Nanostim™ leadless pacemaker (LP). In this study, we report the primary results of the LEADLESS Observational Study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects meeting VVIR pacemaker indications were enrolled and followed up after successful LP implantation, prior to discharge and post-implantation at 90 days, 180 days, and every 6 months thereafter for the assessment of adverse events. The primary safety endpoint was evaluated in terms of freedom from serious adverse device effects (SADEs) at 6 months in 300 subjects. Data for all enrolled subjects were also presented. A total of 470 subjects were enrolled (75.8 ± 13.1 years, 62.8% male). The study paused in April 2014 following the occurrence of perforation events that led to changes in the protocol and investigator training. Freedom from SADEs, evaluated in 300 subjects enrolled post-pause, was 94.6% (95% confidence interval 91.0-97.2%) and demonstrated non-inferiority to a performance goal of 86% (P < 0.0001). Eighteen SADEs were observed in 16 (5.3%) subjects. The most frequently occurring events were cardiac perforation (1.3%), device dislodgement (0.3%), and vascular complications (1.3%). In the 470 subjects, 34 similar SADEs were observed in 31 (6.6%) subjects. After stratifying the results in relation to the study pause, there was a statistically significant difference in the final LP location (septum vs. apex) (P < 0.0001) and the number of repositioning attempts (<2 vs. ≥2) (P = 0.05) and a decreasing trend in the rates of cardiac perforation and device dislodgement.

CONCLUSION

The primary safety endpoint at 6 months was successfully met for the Nanostim LP. The occurrence of cardiac perforation and device dislodgement declined after changes following the study pause.

摘要

目的

一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、上市后研究旨在确认 Nanostim™无导线起搏器(LP)的短期安全性。在这项研究中,我们报告了 LEADLESS 观察性研究的主要结果。

方法和结果

符合 VVIR 起搏器适应证的受试者入选,并在成功植入 LP 后进行随访,在出院前、植入后 90 天、180 天以及此后每 6 个月进行不良事件评估。主要安全性终点是在 300 例受试者中评估 6 个月时无严重不良器械效应(SADE)的发生率。还报告了所有入组受试者的数据。共纳入 470 例受试者(75.8±13.1 岁,62.8%为男性)。2014 年 4 月,由于穿孔事件的发生导致方案和研究者培训的改变,研究暂停。在暂停后入组的 300 例受试者中,无 SADE 发生率为 94.6%(95%置信区间 91.0-97.2%),且不劣于 86%的性能目标(P<0.0001)。16 例(5.3%)受试者出现 18 例 SADE。最常见的事件是心脏穿孔(1.3%)、器械移位(0.3%)和血管并发症(1.3%)。在 470 例受试者中,31 例(6.6%)受试者出现 34 例类似的 SADE。根据研究暂停对结果进行分层后,最终 LP 位置(间隔 vs. 心尖)(P<0.0001)和重新定位尝试次数(<2 次 vs. ≥2 次)(P=0.05)存在统计学差异,且心脏穿孔和器械移位的发生率呈下降趋势。

结论

Nanostim LP 在 6 个月时成功达到主要安全性终点。研究暂停后,心脏穿孔和器械移位的发生率下降。

相似文献

1
Primary safety results from the LEADLESS Observational Study.无导线心脏起搏器 LEADLESS 观察研究的主要安全性结果。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1491-1497. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux359.
2
Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker.经皮植入全心腔内无导线起搏器。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 17;373(12):1125-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507192. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
3
The learning curve associated with the implantation of the Nanostim leadless pacemaker.与Nanostim无导线起搏器植入相关的学习曲线。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;53(2):239-247. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0438-8. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
A leadless pacemaker in the real-world setting: The Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry.真实世界环境中的无导线起搏器:Micra 经导管起搏系统上市后注册研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep;14(9):1375-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-Month results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.经导管起搏系统的长期性能:来自Micra经导管起搏研究的12个月结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 May;14(5):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Combined leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous implantable defibrillator therapy: feasibility, safety, and performance.无导线起搏器与皮下植入式除颤器联合治疗:可行性、安全性及性能
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1740-1747. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv457. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Comparative study of acute and mid-term complications with leadless and transvenous cardiac pacemakers.无导线与经静脉心脏起搏器的急性与中期并发症比较研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jul;15(7):1023-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.022.
8
Midterm Safety and Performance of a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker: 3-Year Follow-up to the LEADLESS Trial (Nanostim Safety and Performance Trial for a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker System).无导线心脏起搏器的中期安全性和性能:LEADLESS试验(无导线心脏起搏器系统的Nanostim安全性和性能试验)的3年随访
Circulation. 2018 Feb 6;137(6):633-635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030106.
9
[Initial implantation experience and short-term follow-up results of implanting leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system].[无导线心腔内导管起搏系统植入的初始经验及短期随访结果]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):866-870. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200305-00160.
10
Incidence of Cardiac Perforation With Conventional and With Leadless Pacemaker Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.传统起搏器系统和无导线起搏器系统导致心脏穿孔的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;28(3):336-346. doi: 10.1111/jce.13140. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless pacemaker 5-year outcomes: good news?无导线起搏器5年随访结果:是好消息吗?
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Apr 16;27(Suppl 3):iii150-iii152. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf034. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Evolution of leadless pacemaker technology.无导线起搏器技术的发展
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Mar 24;27(Suppl 2):ii39-ii46. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae101. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Strategies for Safe Implantation and Effective Performance of Single-Chamber and Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemakers.单腔和双腔无导线起搏器安全植入及有效运行的策略
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 23;12(7):2454. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072454.
4
Brazilian Guidelines for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - 2023.《巴西心脏植入式电子设备指南 - 2023》
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 23;120(1):e20220892. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220892.
5
Cautionary tale of right ventricular perforation during Micra™ leadless pacemaker insertion.Micra™无导线起搏器植入过程中右心室穿孔的警示故事。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;5(6):e869. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.869. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Variation in regional implantation patterns of cardiac implantable electronic device in Switzerland.瑞士心脏植入式电子设备的区域植入模式的变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 16;17(2):e0262959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262959. eCollection 2022.
7
Leadless pacemaker perforations: Clinical consequences and related device and user problems.无导线起搏器穿孔:临床后果及相关器械和使用者问题。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;33(2):154-159. doi: 10.1111/jce.15343. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.无导线起搏器的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价、汇总分析及Meta分析
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2022 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
The wireless pacemaker is on again; from electro-stimulation to synchronization.无线起搏器再次开启;从电刺激到同步。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2021 Oct 8;23(Suppl E):E156-E160. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab111. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
A new leadless pacemaker with atrioventricular synchronous pacing replacing a still working VVI leadless pacemaker: a case report.用具有房室同步起搏功能的新型无导线起搏器替换仍在工作的VVI无导线起搏器:一例病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Aug 15;5(8):ytab305. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab305. eCollection 2021 Aug.