Solomon Olga, Lawlor Mary C
Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar Str. CHP 133, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;42(2):206-243. doi: 10.1007/s11013-017-9562-7.
Research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and other types of dementia describes a behaviour called 'wandering', a term that denotes movement through space lacking intention or exact destination, as when a person is disoriented or not self-aware. In the U.S., 'wandering' in both ASD and AD has been examined mostly from a management and prevention perspective. It prioritizes safety while primarily overlooking personal experiences of those who 'wander' and their families, thus limiting the range of potentially effective strategies to address this issue. Communicative challenges faced by many people diagnosed with ASD and AD further obscure the experiential, existential aspects of 'wandering'. This article reflects an increasing concern of social science scholars interested in whether and how the conceptual and practical strategies to address 'wandering' are informed by the situated experiences of people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and their families. We examine 'wandering' at the intersections of personal experience, family life, clinical practice, public health policy, and legislation, as a conceptually rich site where notions of personhood, subjectivity, intentionality, and quality of life powerfully and consequentially converge to impact the lives of many people with ASD and AD, and their families. We draw upon critical autism studies describing how attributions of personhood, subjectivity, intentionality, rational agency, and moral autonomy of people with ASD have been contingent upon the norms and conventions governing movement of the human body through space (Hilton, Afr Am Rev 50(2):221-235, 2017). When this movement is deemed aberrant, the person may be construed as irrational, a danger to self because of a lack of self-awareness, and a danger to others because of a lack of empathy. These attributions put the person at risk of being excluded from the considerations and, more importantly, the obligations of the 'moral community' to ensure that he or she has a 'good human life' (Barnbaum, The Ethics of Autism: Among Them but not of Them. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2008; Silvers and Francis, Metaphilosophy 40(3/4):475-498, 2009). Using ethnographic, narrative phenomenological (Mattingly, The Paradox of Hope: Journeys through a Clinical Borderland. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010), and medical humanities (Charon, JAMA 286:1897-1902, 2001; Narrative Medicine: Honoring the Stories of Illness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006) approaches, we examine multiple perspectives on 'wandering' in ASD and AD across narrative discourse genres, institutional contexts, and media of representation. We argue for an extension of the prevention and management view to focus not only on safety but also on what phenomenologist Merleau-Ponty (1962) called "having a world" (p. 146). The analysis is intended to inform clinical practice, policy and public health efforts to enhance understanding of first and second person perspectives on 'wandering' in order to improve the participation and quality of life of people with ASD and AD who 'wander', and their families.
关于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)及其他类型痴呆症的研究描述了一种名为“徘徊”的行为,该术语指在空间中无目的或确切目的地的移动,比如当一个人迷失方向或缺乏自我意识时的移动。在美国,针对ASD和AD中的“徘徊”现象,大多是从管理和预防的角度进行研究的。这种研究将安全置于首位,却主要忽视了那些“徘徊”者及其家人的个人经历,因此限制了应对这一问题的潜在有效策略的范围。许多被诊断患有ASD和AD的人所面临的沟通挑战,进一步掩盖了“徘徊”在体验和存在层面的意义。本文反映出社会科学学者日益关注的一个问题,即应对“徘徊”的概念性和实践性策略是否以及如何受到认知和发育障碍患者及其家人的实际经历的影响。我们在个人经历、家庭生活、临床实践、公共卫生政策和立法的交叉点上审视“徘徊”,将其视为一个概念丰富的领域,在这个领域中,人格、主体性、意向性和生活质量等概念有力且必然地交汇在一起,从而对许多患有ASD和AD的人及其家人的生活产生影响。我们借鉴批判性自闭症研究,这些研究描述了ASD患者的人格、主体性、意向性、理性行为能力和道德自主性的归属是如何取决于支配人体在空间中移动的规范和惯例的(希尔顿,《非裔美国人评论》50(2):221 - 235,2017)。当这种移动被视为异常时,这个人可能会被认为是不理性的,由于缺乏自我意识而对自身构成危险,并且由于缺乏同理心而对他人构成危险。这些归属使这个人面临被排除在“道德共同体”的考量之外的风险,更重要的是,面临被排除在“道德共同体”确保其拥有“美好的人类生活”的义务之外的风险(巴恩鲍姆,《自闭症伦理学:身处其中却不属于他们》。印第安纳大学出版社,布卢明顿,2008;西尔弗斯和弗朗西斯,《元哲学》40(3/4):475 - 498,2009)。我们运用人种志、叙事现象学(马丁利,《希望的悖论:穿越临床边缘地带的旅程》。伯克利:加利福尼亚大学出版社,2010)和医学人文学(查伦,《美国医学会杂志》286:1897 - 1902,2001;《叙事医学:尊重疾病的故事》。纽约:牛津大学出版社,2006)方法,审视了ASD和AD中“徘徊”在叙事话语体裁、机构背景和表现媒介等方面的多种视角。我们主张扩展预防和管理的观点,使其不仅关注安全,还关注现象学家梅洛 - 庞蒂(1962)所称的“拥有一个世界”(第146页)。该分析旨在为临床实践、政策和公共卫生工作提供参考,以增进对“徘徊”的第一人称和第二人称视角的理解,从而提高那些“徘徊”的ASD和AD患者及其家人的参与度和生活质量。