Follador Lucio, Alves Ragami C, Ferreira Sandro Dos S, Buzzachera Cosme F, Andrade Vinicius F Dos S, Garcia Erick D S de A, Osiecki Raul, Barbosa Sara C, de Oliveira Letícia M, da Silva Sergio G
1 Department of Physical Education, 28122 Federal University of Paraná , Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
2 Department of Physical Education, University of Northern Paraná, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Apr;125(2):329-350. doi: 10.1177/0031512518754584. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
This study examined the extent to which different high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and sprint interval training (SIT) protocols could influence psychophysiological responses in moderately active young men. Fourteen participants completed, in a randomized order, three cycling protocols (SIT: 4 × 30-second all-out sprints; Tabata: 7 × 20 seconds at 170% ⋮O; and HIIT: 10 × 60 seconds at 90% HR) and three running HIIT protocols (4 × 4 minutes at 90%-95% HR, 5 × at v⋮O, and 4 × 1,000 meters at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 8, from the OMNI-Walk/Run scale). Oxygen uptake (⋮O), heart rate, and RPE were recorded during each interval. Affective responses were assessed before and after each trial. The Tabata protocol elicited the highest ⋮O and RPE responses, and the least pleasant session-affect among the cycling trials. The v⋮O elicited the highest ⋮O and RPE responses and the lowest mean session-affect among the running trials. Findings highlight the limited application of SIT and some HIIT protocols to individuals with low fitness levels.
本研究考察了不同的高强度间歇训练（HIIT）和冲刺间歇训练（SIT）方案对中度活跃的年轻男性心理生理反应的影响程度。14名参与者以随机顺序完成了三种骑行方案（SIT：4次×30秒全力冲刺；塔巴塔训练法：7次×20秒，强度为最大摄氧量的170%；HIIT：10次×60秒，心率为90%）和三种跑步HIIT方案（4次×4分钟，心率为90%-95%，5次×最大摄氧量，以及4次×1000米，自OMNI步行/跑步量表中感知运动用力程度（RPE）评分为8）。在每个间歇期间记录摄氧量（VO₂）、心率和RPE。在每次试验前后评估情感反应。在骑行试验中，塔巴塔训练法引发了最高的VO₂和RPE反应，且是最不愉快的训练时段情感体验。在跑步试验中，最大摄氧量方案引发了最高的VO₂和RPE反应，且平均训练时段情感体验最低。研究结果凸显了SIT和部分HIIT方案对低体能水平个体的应用局限性。
